Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

MurderDoneRight t1_je4syx5 wrote

Can I commission you to make one just like this but with really long nipples and the nipples have fingernails growing on them? Also, she must have Hulk Hogan's iconic silky blonde hair and mustache.

Edit: You decide whether or not the nipples should have knuckles. I am fine either way.

210

mrdog23 t1_je4zbqj wrote

It's beautiful. Also, nice tits.

3

SirGlenn t1_je5ey0f wrote

I'm in love at first sight! Lovely picture.💋💋

−9

abitrolly t1_je5mxln wrote

The evening light that you won't get in a city.

1

Plusran t1_je5w5n8 wrote

that's actually pretty well done

−1

Bender3455 t1_je5wblh wrote

This looks amazing! What's the basic process on this: take a photo, enhance digitally, add other objects and effects, soften as if painted? Is that correct?

1

A0ma t1_je60rp9 wrote

Another day, another naked woman on r/art...

114

zeldanar t1_je61ukz wrote

Love how well you did her face. So realistic and beautiful!

1

dapperteco t1_je6219c wrote

Posting nude women is a fucking cheat code for getting karma in here

128

MTGBruhs t1_je63okj wrote

Shes beautiful, lovely woman

−8

Alvaro1555 t1_je63ynp wrote

This looks amazing. Nice work on the flow of the fabric, and the moss on the stone really gives more life to it.

By the way, I found it funny that by playing with the spelling I could say "los pechos" in Spanish (the breasts). But then I searched the meaning and saw the surface at the top of the stone and it made more sense. I love it.

8

Bender3455 t1_je658un wrote

Replying to losbadhombres (#2,455,346)

Oh absolutely! The most I do with clouds (for example) is take pictures of very dynamic skies, then replace them into photos with boring skies, and adjust lighting to match. Here, you're creating the clouds and the atmosphere, and it all comes together beautifully. I'm honestly extremely impressed. I have so many questions, but i'll let you get back to your art. Have a good day!

1

-Roxaaa t1_je6gg7t wrote

the title means "the mirror"

1

angryeggyboy t1_je6hjlg wrote

Two naked skinny white women on r/art in a row? It's more likely than you'd think!

24

blingding369 t1_je6nlso wrote

Man, at the same time i want you to make art that's demure and also never do that.

−7

kylomanny1104 t1_je6x29k wrote

Holy crap, when I first saw it I thought it was legit just a nude pic, but the fact this is digital art!? It’s way too detailed. I am thoroughly impressed 👏👏👏

0

JamesJ74 t1_je72njp wrote

Wow, it’s more art than sexy that’s pretty cool

−5

FrenchManc t1_je73l97 wrote

When I see the comments, i'm not surprised americans school are banning visits to florence so kids don't see michelangelo statues, those people are proper weirdos when it comes to seing people naked.

4

ImUrShoota84 t1_je73rjh wrote

Did you draw that from memory or have a model/picture for reference?

1

tinkflowers t1_je79882 wrote

Replying to angryeggyboy (#2,457,975)

Ok hear me out, I don’t think she’s skinny or white? I mean OP made a pretty girl but this isn’t what people consider skinny these days and she appears to not be white. But wtf do I know.

8

BelatedGamer t1_je7bap7 wrote

Replying to DefinitelyNotCarol (#2,460,230)

Counting them out right now, only three of the first ten are NSFW if you're viewing by "Hot". Viewing by "New", there isn't a single one in the top twenty right now. People go out of their way to find things to make them angry.

18

Behind_You_Sir t1_je7d20c wrote

Replying to FrenchManc (#2,462,729)

It’s not a matter of being offended by naked people on r/Art (even though they do get spanned here often.) The issue they have is with this particular OP, and how often they repost and spam these images on this sub. It’s pretty damn tiring seeing the same nude model posted here every week in a slightly different pose while they pander their patreon on their profile. It’s shitty and uninspired art and advertising at this point.

20

MermaidDrugs t1_je7ewdx wrote

Not a single body hair to be found 😂

−6

screamingracoon t1_je7f78b wrote

Replying to FrenchManc (#2,462,729)

Oooh, shush!

The issue is that this sub is constantly filled with low effort depictions of conventionally attractive thin women, not the nudity. They're all the same, with the woman who just stands or lays prettily and is there to be gawked at. It's boring.

21

artful_todger_502 t1_je7knyt wrote

Gorgeous! Wow ... Frazetta meets old Dutch Master. Fantastic work!

1

munchkickin t1_je7lmjj wrote

This is a beautiful piece. Almost has an ethereal feel. Well done.

1

munchkickin t1_je7m70q wrote

Why is everyone so upset about this poster, genuinely asking? I went through their stuff and, to me, it’s more tasteful than most of the nude pics. Every artist has a specific style they go to, this posters is just nude woman they prefer. I personally prefer painting nature. To each their own. 🤷‍♀️

−1

FrenchManc t1_je7yw36 wrote

Replying to screamingracoon (#2,465,271)

Low effort? Thin woman ? Conventional beauty? Just standing? Have you ever seen a renaissance painting? Nothing in your comment makes sense but I guess that's what growing up in a country without culture does to somebody. You're just confused, without references, and have no clue how much work goes into creating a piece like that, (you'll maybe know if you ever enter a conservatory or attempt to create anything related to art someday in your life instead of typing troll comments on the internet).

OP I hope you don't get discouraged posting here because of the few weirdos commenting, there are people whose disaproval should be encouraging more than anything.

−12

odif8 t1_je80v11 wrote

I absolutely love the feelings this evokes. Beautiful piece. Gorgeous form. Lovely colors.

1

screamingracoon t1_je831qx wrote

Replying to FrenchManc (#2,469,510)

Lmao are you really asking an Italian if she has ever seen a painting from the Renaissance???

Are you really forgetting that the Renaissance also happened half a millennium ago? And that we’ve already seen these naked objects over and over and over again? In fact, you speak French in your profile, so you should know that naked Venuses stopped being at the center of attention of the artistic world when people realized that Manet’s Olympia was far more interesting to discuss than Cabanel’s Birth of Venus.

r/art is constantly filled with objectified, naked women with semi-inspirational titles to cover for the fact that the nudity is nothing but a quick way to gather karma (which is also funny, considering that most naked paintings of Venuses in the history of art have been used and referred to as erotic paintings. The only difference as to why they’re better revered is because there is the added historical layer to them - and no, I’m not talking about Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, that’s another discussion).

Go home and study art history from the Renaissance onwards, because it’s very clear that you’re confused about it all.

11

FrenchManc t1_je855jb wrote

Replying to screamingracoon (#2,470,424)

You just seem very rattled that some people enjoy painting or watching paintings of naked women and you never explain why, Even tho with your constant use of the word "objectified" (even tho you never explain how they are objectified) I think I have my opinion of why that i'll keep to myself.

Also I can see you tried to sneak as much names as you could remember because you got offended that I mistook you for a disney raised american but you trying to imply that erotism & beauty stopped being the driving force behind a good portion of all art ever created because "people realized that Manet’s Olympia was far more interesting" (????) is childish, laughable, and makes it impossible to give you any credibility.

−4

D3dshotCalamity t1_je8ch2y wrote

Replying to jerry111165 (#2,466,095)

I like it too, and no one said it was porn. It just kinda makes my eyes roll when the amount of attention a piece gets is multiplied tenfold simply because it has a naked woman in it. Kinda like how if you post a picture of you next to your artwork, it'll get more upvotes than if you just posted the artwork. You can make the argument that seeing the artist next to the art helps us connect to it more, but really, this is Reddit, we're all socially inept gremlins that can't make human connections to save our lives. We like tits, tits = upvotes, even in the highly sophisticated subreddit that is /r/art.

17

sgtmich t1_je8kbpn wrote

This is insanely beautiful

1

MrBeanCyborgCaptain t1_je8meea wrote

Great job on the hair. What did you use, xGen? I've been using that on a character for a short film and it is a TEDIOUS process.

2

AgenMerlin t1_je8qy6j wrote

This is absolutely fantastic, really pretty and beautiful. I love it. You're a great artist! <3

1

t4nk909 t1_je8r4kf wrote

This is beautiful! Great job.

1

GsTSaien t1_je910gp wrote

Is the title a pun for "los pechos" ?????

1

Muph_o3 t1_je9ix7f wrote

Holy shit, i love the cracks on the stone. Also the foliage, the moss looks super convincing.

The nipples look like they could use a little more displacement, they look kinda flat-texture to me. But overall it's great.

1

jagracer2021 t1_jeazyaa wrote

I agree that the stone is nice, but the girl is nicer.

1