Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

mcfarmer72 t1_j3znfob wrote

Those are the good ones. Why a new drum ?

67

jankyj t1_j3zoabe wrote

Enjoy putting a ton of unnecessary wear on your clothes while wasting water and energy.

−38

itaniumonline t1_j3zpeo9 wrote

We got a set of those. Im going to include them in the will. Lol

309

reticentrebel t1_j3zpwib wrote

That's the set we have had for over a decade, still running strong.

10

SweetAlyssumm t1_j3zqw7y wrote

I am so jealous. I just ordered the dryer for several million dollars. Have had the washer five years, love it.

6

PunIntended1234 t1_j3zu5tj wrote

You'll find the snake hiding in there later though! LMAO! That's why it was so cheap!

9

Dustin_peterz t1_j3zuhyl wrote

I'd been using the same speed queen dryer and washer in an apartment I just moved out of. I'd lived there for 20 YEARS. The house I just moved into had speed queen washer and dryers. The third day the dryer broke and I fixed it my self with YouTube. I will never buy another brand of washer/dryer.

116

muddytodd t1_j3zuox1 wrote

You know what wastes even more? Replacing a machine every 5-10 years. These models could last a lifetime and have far greater repairability than energy efficient models.

15

nirad t1_j3zx4gb wrote

I wish these fit in my washer dryer closet

1

yellowsweater1414 t1_j3zyy5f wrote

I paid more than that to repair my not-speedqueen dryer this week.

28

Opesneakpastya t1_j400esn wrote

These seem to be the only decent, life long appliance purchase now!

1

thedanishcoffeenerd t1_j4023c3 wrote

For the dryer I'd highly recommend everyone to always buy a heat pump dryer. They use so much less power that the money saved on electricity far outweighs the extra initial cost. A heat pump dryer only uses around 300-500W compare to 2000W for a traditional dryer. That is quickly a lot of money saved if you run it often. Also it's better for the environment.

35

verywidebutthole t1_j4035m3 wrote

Are you sure they don't? I have a shallow closet and it was a pain finding a dryer that fit. The washer was easy. These would have fit but we won't stay here too long so we don't care about the longevity much vs what we bought at half the price.

2

bookerTmandela t1_j407jak wrote

Man people are downvoting you hard, but you’re speaking the truth. Plus they essentially use a loophole to get around Department of Energy’s efficiency regulations.

People love them because they’re built like tanks and are just willing to overlook everything else about them.

10

DejaBOOM t1_j40fl23 wrote

Speed Queen is made in my hometown, Ripon, WI. They make some of the best washers and dryers money can buy. You got really lucky! Congrats!! 🫶👏

28

Crabuki t1_j40g0m5 wrote

22g/load vs a HE machine using 7g/load could, in theory, become a pain point in the future. Depends on where you live, obvs.

3

thedanishcoffeenerd t1_j40jwve wrote

They work like a refrigerator and has very few moving parts that can break down. Like how often does for fridge jut die? It's not too complicated for a technician to deal with, but I also live in a country where heat pumps are common for hole house heating so we have technicians available for heat pumps. Also always buy from a well know Company that also has good repair service. I don't know any specific brands because it'll vary a lot from country to country how the service is.

8

jankyj t1_j40kz9i wrote

I live in Europe (Netherlands). A Miele machine costs around 20% more than other quality brands (Bosch, Siemens, AEG, etc.), and lasts on average 20 years – 50% longer on average than other brands. That was my driving factor when I chose to buy a Miele,

5

jankyj t1_j40lewq wrote

I live in the Netherlands. Vented dryers are non-existent. All models are either heat pump or condensing. For my region, reparability is not an issue, but indeed always wise to check what is the case in your market to make an educated decision about reparability.

7

b1tchlasagna t1_j40ntfv wrote

This.

I can understand the idea of "buy it for life" but the running costs of such an old appliance are insane

I recently bought this

https://www.pauldavieskitchensandappliances.co.uk/miele-tcr780wp-freestanding-condenser-heat-pump-tumble-dryer-white.html.

There are cheaper alternatives out there made, BUT I bought that because '

It's A+++-10%. Stupidly no country within the EEA has downgraded the grading of heat pump tumble dryers. If they downgraded it, an A+++-10% EPC would maybe be EPC C rated on the new scale

It's also got a reversing drum which helps with drying times, and less ironing required (therefore less electricity and less time)

It's also a Miele. LG and Samsung do the same thing for about half the price but I don't fancy how unreliable those things are.

Here's my thread on it too

https://www.reddit.com/r/BuyItForLife/comments/10a0i8w

19

small_e_900 t1_j40tccj wrote

We bought a new washer and dryer last year. After showing us a bunch of machines, I asked the sales person what the difference was between some brand of machine and a Speed Queen. He said that all the machines in the store are ten year machines except the Speed Queen machines. The Speed Queen machines are twenty-five year machines. We went with the Speed Queen.

1

notahoppybeerfan t1_j40vaxp wrote

My wife and I joke our kids will fight the most over our Speedqueen’s when we’re gone.

2

teun95 t1_j40y2bq wrote

Huh, I didn't notice this but you're right. Our last dryer was a vented dryer, but that was a pretty old one. I just checked online and they're barely sold anymore. Just a few irrelevant brands.

1

Napkin_whore t1_j40zm6t wrote

Ahh the SpeedQueen.

The last relevant item on this sub, cuz everything is is made the break these days m.

1

shawn-fff t1_j40zzmw wrote

I mean, is there a version of the speed queens that are better. I’m reading your comment as saying that new speed queens are not what older ones are. I’m happy to get an older one, there are a few on my local marketplace and my 15 year old LG is out again after me replacing the heating element last year, so I’m considering getting a pair of used speed queens.

12

nicosmom61 t1_j410vaw wrote

I can say this for sure . I will never have another samsung anything in my house their w/d are crap . I will go with maytag or speed queen . My last set before the samsung was maytag and they were wonderful , real work horses but these samsung what crap they are !!! Never again . Glad im moving in 3 yrs to my retirement home and there will be no sam sung anything in my home every again .

3

small_e_900 t1_j4129ig wrote

My daughter is very handy. Three times in the last two years she called me to walk her through the repair of her Samsung dryer. Once the drive belt flipped. Once the heating element failed. Last week the belt tensioner failed. Fortunately she is able to do the repairs or she would have had to pay at least as much in repairs as the machine cost.

She too said that she'll never buy anything Samsung again...well, except, maybe their phones. They're boss.

1

uEpYN2vYZPCRpH3vjC3r t1_j416wsb wrote

I've had 2 to 4 Speed Queen washer / gas dryer sets running 4 loads a day for up to 20 years. Including 2 of the newer design. Newer washers are slower, more bothersome safety interlocks, more electronic jazz.

I do prefer the old washer design. I think the new ones are still worth it, but might look for a used older unit next time

6

Choosemyusername t1_j417m4t wrote

The problem with these is those old angered washers and older driers are really hard on your clothes. I moved from a place with new ones to a place with an older one and I was shocked at the difference.

If the point is to buy less stuff, upgrading your washer and drier can be a BIFL move.

75

frunch t1_j418sn8 wrote

Which Maytags are you referring to? Do you have any model numbers? I'm frequently trying to help people decide on new washers/dryers and the more good options, the better. I've seen my share of newer Maytags getting kicked to the curb in 5-8 years (busted transmissions/gearboxes, usually).

Would something like the MVWP575GW fit the bill?

3

LexusBrian400 t1_j419j64 wrote

12 year appliance tech here -

Yes. This is the way.

1

Lindvaettr t1_j41aj99 wrote

SpeedQueens are commercial washers and dryers, so are intended to do a passable job for a very long time, with few other considerations.

Their washers and dryers, from what I've read in several articles that I've read because I keep seeing these l on this sub, not only use a lot more energy than consumer washers and dryers, but are also a lot harder on clothes.

They're laundromat machines, and that's the quality of wash you'll get.

1

LividLager t1_j41cgvf wrote

I don't believe so. The reviews on the current models are disappointing, and there's reddit posts on those models complaining about the company. Was recommending the brand to a coworker a month ago, when I briefly looked into them for it, once I saw the model I've had for 6 years was discontinued.

1

teun95 t1_j41d8yu wrote

These old Speed Queen washing machines should not be used. I will explain.

I often see people mention here that it is more environmentally friendly to keep using these Speed Queen laundry machines and dryers than to purchase a more efficient new model. For many products this is true. But these devices here are EXTREMELY ineffecient compared to an energy efficient model.

A Speed Queen AWN432 model uses 0.96 kWh per cycle^(1) while a Miele with the new A label uses 0.493kWh^(2) per cycle. Additionally, the Speed Queen uses more than twice (!)^(1 2) as much water. Taking the CO2 emissions of water purification and wastewater processing, the Miele only produces 49% of what the Speed Queen produces. This adds up to more than half a tonne more CO2 emissions over 10 years of use. See my spreadsheet ^(6).

Of course we have to look at manufacturing and transport too, but this barely changes the picture. A washing machine uses so much energy that the production and disposal are hardly significant compared to the energy consumption during its use^(3). This paper mentions that the usage of a washing machine accounts for around 80% of its CO2 emissions^(4).

Laundry represents 18% of all emissions in the US and 3% of national Co2 emissions^(5), so it's worth paying attention to this!

1: https://images.webfronts.com/cache/frysbageflai.pdf. I picked this particular washing machine for comparison because it's from a brand that lasts long and does up to 9kg per load. There are slightly more efficient washing machines, but picking a less brand would not be a fair comparison. 2: https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/washingmachines2019/295205
3: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Fig-2-Life-Cycle-Assessment-of-a-washing-machine_fig2_235679049
4: (table on page 5, in Japanese) https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jie1992/75/12/75_12_1050/_pdf

5: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19438150903541873#:~:text=The%20emissions%20from%20residential%20laundry%20care%20%28water%20supply%2C,of%20the%20national%20carbon%20dioxide%20emissions%20in%202005.

6: The 220 washing cycles per year is based on the EU average. For families it's likely more.

7

LatchedNipple t1_j41dht5 wrote

No, there was a government change that was mandated for water conservation.

It's pretty well known and Speed Queen even talks about it. The trick is to take it from Normal and set to Perm Press.

That's the old water level and the way it worked before the mandate.

6

Intrepid00 t1_j41ev72 wrote

> I can understand the idea of “buy it for life” but the running costs of such an old appliance are insane

Oh god yes, even if my refrigerator only lasts 10-15 years your buy it for life fridge from the 70s is using so much energy it would have bought 2 of my refrigerators in that time. Some of the “they don’t last as long” is strictly because of having to use more energy efficient designs and materials that just isn’t as strong as thick heavy steel and cast iron. Some is just bad design or trying to get too fancy like French door fridges with a door ice dispenser.

There are things worth it for buy it for life but refrigerators, old as hell heat pumps, washer and dryer, and dishwashers become very debatable if they are worth it when looking at energy costs and how well they actually work.

Now an expensive pair of jeans that last forever is a no debate it’s worth the cost.

10

b1tchlasagna t1_j41l7kj wrote

My dishwasher is "D rated" on the new EPC scale. It would have been A+++ rated on the old one

I don't truly care because it cost me £200, and I use it maybe once a week. If that lasts me, that's great. If it doesn't, no biggy because my own BIFL habit is to... not having had a dish washer most of my life. If it fails in five years time it's just another £200 or so

The A rated ones are ridiculously expensive for little energy efficiency gain

3

teun95 t1_j41oj3n wrote

You don't have to. There are decent brands that produce even more energy efficient machines.

If you simply want to find an energy efficient laundry machine that's available where you live I'd just check the webshop that people tend to use for this and short on energy efficiency. I guarantee that some cheap and decent washing machines will pop up.

If you want to find the most energy efficient laundry machines available, you can use the product database of the European Commission for this. It contains all products that are required to have an energy efficiency label. See their page for washing machines and sort on energy efficiency. Among the top results are Electrolux, AEG, Hoover and Candy. I'm not an expert on this, but I believe some of these brands are known to be decent and affordable.

3

b1tchlasagna t1_j41uinx wrote

Oh for sure. I mentioned my own requirements because I couldn't set why I'd need to spend a few hundred extra to save minus still a few hundred

That's the main reason that stops me from buying a Miele solar save dish washer. Like yes it uses so much less, and yes, it makes better use of my solar panels but also its a lot more expensive for what's realistically little gain (for me)

My D rated dishwasher uses 0.85 kWh per cycle. An A rated one uses 0.54 kWh per cycle. If you use it every single day, you're looking at a saving of 113.15 kWh in a year. In the UK, assuming April 2023 pricing that's a saving of £61.11 a year

When electricity was 15p/kWh, then you'd have to use your dishwasher multiple times a day for it to be cheaper. Assuming you're using it once a day, that's a saving of a mere £17 a year. Assuming also that it lasts ten years, I'd look to have spent £200 extra, max.

But again that is if I was using it once a day, which I'm not.

3

OhJohnO t1_j41xcbu wrote

I have that exact set. It’s fantastic.

PRO TIP: if you want to be able to open the washer and keep it running, there’s a switch under the back right that can be held down with a clothespin or piece of foam. Here’s a video of it.

2

OhJohnO t1_j41yns8 wrote

Personally, even though I understand that the efficiency isn’t the same as newer machines, I find that reliability to price is unbeatable. Knowing that for the next 20 years, this thing will be a tank, and I won’t have to mess with it, (and when I do, repairs will be simple and affordable) beats out the day to day efficiency issues. Efficiency isn’t necessarily the primary concern for all consumers.

3

chillinn_at_work t1_j41z38t wrote

adore my speedqueens. It's only been 4 years but the only issues we've had with them were user error. They'll outlive me for sure.

1

Preblegorillaman t1_j420t3v wrote

Get the one on their website with the lower spin cycle RPM. The newer models spin a bit faster with the direct drive (one of the positives of direct drive) but the old bulletproof style with the transmissions are still made.

1

SirPenisaurusRex t1_j4213q8 wrote

And even in some cases where it does get fancy. If anything fails on the main control board of a washer or dryer, the only "answer" is typically a $250-$500 board replacement. I just got done replacing the heating element relay on my driver's board for the high high cost of... 10 dollars. This does require soldering to remove the old relay and install the new one, but close to everything is fixable.

4

PachinkoGear t1_j423hbn wrote

How are you going to control it without Bluetooth though??

3

mudokin t1_j424mvj wrote

How is the energy and water efficiancy on these``?

2

Apollo_O t1_j4251gr wrote

My parents got married in 1977. They bought a Maytag washer and dryer. They finally replaced them because of broken parts that couldn't be procured in 2019 and 2022. They only had minor repairs 3-4 times on each machine over the entire life.

They replaced them with SpeedQueens.

3

NousDefions81 t1_j42829h wrote

>MVWP575GW

That is the Maytag washer I have, and I really, really like it. I've only had it 5 years (I've had my Speed Queen dryer for 8) but it works like the day I bought it.

1

NousDefions81 t1_j428ecz wrote

They are not water efficient at ALL, which Consumer Reports weighs very heavily.

However, most of the energy from washing clothes comes from hot water, but modern good detergents are designed to clean with cold water. I run nothing but a cold water (or cool, in the winter, via the Maytag) wash and have no issues with stains whatsoever (I have three small children).

1

wd668 t1_j42ey4q wrote

>old angered washers

I hereby charge that this old angered washer did feloniously and without just cause munch on premium dress shirts until they were deprived of all form and appearance.

3

curtludwig t1_j42imm1 wrote

Nice! I looked at a set brand new last month for $2600...

1

SerpentDrago t1_j42k49o wrote

Yeah gas and electric Dryer's that don't have crazy digital screens Are all easy to work on. I would say 80% of the issues you would run into are fixed for less than $100 in an hour of your time. Maybe another hour? Looking up the issues and ordering the parts. Most of the time there's even a local repair shop that has the parts.

I always say get a nice Fancy efficient front loader washer. Then get a bog standard big ass dryer with auto sense and without digital screens. A dryer unless it's a heat pump. One can't really be efficient. Besides, the ability to turn itself off when it detects the clothes are dry. It gets its efficiency by your washer. Ringing out all the water to where it doesn't have to do much work. So spend the money on the washer. I personally prefer LG washers with direct drives as they are actually pretty easy to work on and generally reliable and come with a 10-year warranty on the drive

2

squishy__squids t1_j42kpx7 wrote

Yeah I was just making a joke (but unless you have a thigh gap, which is rare and weird, you have chafing). It's best to wash jeans as little as possible; the washing machine exaggerates any spots of wear and tear. Most dirty spots can be washed out by hand and left to dry, a washing machine is only necessary when the whole garment has been thoroughly soiled

8

rosinall t1_j42m3lk wrote

Not quite. They met the government standard to sell in the US and added a "deep fill" option button that basically overrode it. I can't find anything to support what you said about the perm press override, this NYT article is like the many, many others I read supporting this point and not touching on yours.

0

LatchedNipple t1_j42n5wn wrote

We shared our results with Speed Queen, and the representatives were not surprised. McDonald even told us that the company coaches dealers to tell customers not to use the Normal Eco cycle and to use the Permanent Press or Heavy Duty cycle instead.

That's in the article you quote.

1

cherlin t1_j42n6af wrote

That's an insane deal, last year we bought a house and I think it was about $2400 our tc5/dc5 plus a multi month wait :/

1

snorlackx t1_j42t04j wrote

I repair appliances for a living and no one in our company works on them. also went out to one by accident and customer said we were the 8th company they called trying to get it repaired. theres simply not enough of them in my market to get trained on them. also cant justify spending 100+ hours of training for a machine you will run into once or twice a year.

1

starsandjars t1_j433i1h wrote

That washer is the best washer. My mom, my dad, and my grandma have the same one.

1

xxMrAdamsxx t1_j438ncy wrote

Damn that is a serious find. Those units run forever. I’ve never come across one for less than $1k let alone a set for under $200. Great job.

1

JohnnyGoldwink t1_j43h99n wrote

Damn… where’d ya find that STEAL of a deal. Congrats!

1

binkkit t1_j43jtdc wrote

I have that washer. It's fantastic. You got a steal!

1

Marshmallow_64 t1_j43jtui wrote

I have that same set, been going strong 5 years now.

1

lanopticx t1_j43lcgw wrote

Wow you must be really strong picking up both a washer and dryer! And to make $175 doing it, nice job!

3

softawre t1_j43nlfw wrote

What a deal.

Have a set of speed queena. though, I spent about 15x that

1

TrixnTim t1_j43vs8s wrote

I disagree. The guy who sold me mine has been working in appliances sales for over 30 years. He knew I wanted American made, simple, for life. He went through stats and consumer reports details with me for over an hour. Guy was brilliant.

2

brandywine-farm t1_j449258 wrote

Rather have electrical power from coal? No..that was converted to gas...wait. now gas is bad so..convert to ?? Solar is worse than hydro. Wave power is destructive to sea life. Wind turbines are killing birds and break down all the time. Pick your poison. I'm ok with my hydro..and a few solar panels and my well water. People shouldn't live in the desert and expect water to be delivered to them, and when it's short, expect everyone else to change their lifestyle and equipment because of their self-perpetuated situation. To each his own.

2

TrixnTim t1_j44okau wrote

One thing the salesman taught me was the drum i side used to be made of steel. That changed due to costs, etc. and now parts are fiberglass, etc. He seemed to imply that the good quality went away with steel parts.

1

The_Evil_Pillow t1_j44p0bi wrote

There’s a reason they’re removing dams. The energy is many times unnecessary and ecosystems especially salmon and other freshwater aquatics are essentially destroyed. Solar and wind is no where near as bad lmao. Provide a source before you spout complete bs like that. I’m providing some context for you since you seem pretty gung-ho on hydro which on paper seems really great.

https://www.earthlawcenter.org/blog-entries/2017/12/dams-climate-change-bad-news

0

cylonlover t1_j45camz wrote

It's funny how american appliances always have the controls on the top and back, while in Europe they're on the front. I wonder what the rest of the world have. I think it's pretty much only an american thing, but I have only ever been in Europe and Asia, so don't know really.

In Europe we'd often have the dryer on top of the washer to save floor space. That will require front panel controls.

Great looking set, though. May it last a generation more.

1

brandywine-farm t1_j46ci2v wrote

Energy is not needed?? LOL. The grid can't keep up as it is.....
There were rolling blackouts during this freeze because TVA couldn't produce enough electricity and they couldn't "bring it in" from anywhere else.
Please.
"earthlawcenter" sounds completely unbiased. :/
The dams are working until we get fusion or people stop being afraid of nuclear....there are no other choices unless we want to return to the stone age, but *gasp* that's burning wood.

1

0987654321585 t1_j47qza3 wrote

These are the best damn washers and dryers you can get, my grandmother has had this set for 40 years and the only problem she ever had was that recently the dryers start button fell off

1

daymanmustache t1_j4q1dqg wrote

For reliability to price you’d have to consider the extra cost of electricity and water over that 20 year period. Even if you get 20 trouble free years, I think you will be paying a pretty substantial premium and using more resources.

1

thebritishhippie t1_j5if2za wrote

We've had that washer for almost 20 years at this point lol. weird seeing this in the wild.

1