Submitted by NewsHugh t3_125zzo4 in Connecticut
dkdaniel t1_je82vm9 wrote
Reply to comment by CANOODLING_SOCIOPATH in Connecticut to Test Speed Enforcement Cameras in Work Zones Beginning in April by NewsHugh
He fenced his position by preemptively claiming anybody who disagrees must be getting paid, that there is no possible good faith reason to disagree. It's intellectual cowardice.
optifreebraun t1_je9fg0d wrote
Ad hominem attacks of cowardice - almost as if you’re a professional who’s livelihood depended on this.
And in this case I am correct - you are getting paid. Who else is this passionate about installing regressive taxation solutions that are effective only for raising money for private companies?
dkdaniel t1_je9q0ix wrote
Do you not realize that calling everyone a shill is an Ad Hominem?
optifreebraun t1_je9qncs wrote
I’m not calling everyone a shill - just the people that are shills. I seem to have caught at least a couple in this thread.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments