Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

zgrizz t1_iuek1qd wrote

That's really cool. Thanks!

1

colslaww t1_iueo08a wrote

Any idea what year the map was made ? My little town of Wolcott, hadn’t popped up yet.

3

halcyon_r t1_iueotw8 wrote

Interesting there’s no Tolland County yet

1

Porcupine224 t1_iueq359 wrote

Some observations as someone who isn't well-educated in CT history at all:

-Southington is nowhere to be found; further reading shows it was the "South Society of Farmington" until being an official town in 1779.

-The clear pattern of older cities surrounding the waterways and expansion going further outward from there can be seen by the years of settlement.

-"Saybrook". Just that.

-The almost uniform boundaries of Litchfield county at the time. Like there was a concerted effort to split the county evenly into towns all at once.

-How recently the towns we know of and think of as staples of CT were formed based on just being separate neighborhoods that declared township.

-Tolland and Middlesex counties don't exist.

-Beginnings of I-95 and I-91 are obvious. The route I-84 eventually creates isn't present.

As a map nerd, old maps like these are sooo interesting. Thanks for sharing!

31

869066 t1_iuetmm7 wrote

r/takebackthenotch

40

IGameOnMac t1_iuf6rtc wrote

Ah… before 1821… my major city… Bridgeport hasn’t popped up yet either

Someone mentioned southington is no where to be found… founded 1779 so before then I assume

1

Few-Information7570 t1_iuf8ci7 wrote

And we still have interesting issues with borders. Could black rock go back to being part of Fairfield? On Ridgefields east side, Lewisboro could easily just be an extension as it was before it was ceded to NYS. Interesting stuff.

2

imjustaidan t1_iuf95t7 wrote

I might be bad at reading maps but it seems that the route from new Milford to new Fairfield would be impossible now because of candlewood lake, which was made in 1928. Crazy how something so big and such a staple of the area is man made.

8

neurocellulose t1_iufd9pn wrote

It's from 1933, part of the lead up to the Tercentenary of the state. Some of the omissions are odd but I think the lack of town-by-town resolution is for the sake of clarity.

2

billdf99 t1_iufjp95 wrote

Really interesting observations. Thanks for sharing.

I think I CAN make out 84. Follow the road from danbury to Newtown to Southbury to Waterbury to Hartford. This map isn't exactly correct so it's hard to follow, but I think that's the general path.

4

NerdDruggist t1_iufm6fd wrote

I’m curious what the different colors for the churches signify.

Edit: sigh, if I had looked at the legend, I wouldn’t have had to ask

3

UnitDogeX t1_iufpd54 wrote

dang Fairfield was big, I now live in modern day Fairfield

1

fekinEEEjit t1_iufq72j wrote

New London Turnpike from Gbury to the southeast!

1

Porcupine224 t1_iufvw89 wrote

Yeah, you're right I can see it. I was more commenting on how 95 and 91 already appear as "major" roads at this time. I definitely would have thought 84 came before 91.

3

marua06 t1_iufzk74 wrote

This is fantastic, thank you

3

CTHistory42 OP t1_iug40tm wrote

Great article! And yes, the stagecoaches were timed to coordinate with the steamers so that, for example, someone going from Litchfield to New York City had to start off at 3 am to take the stagecoach to Norwalk. But, they could get back home the very same day, if their appointment in NYC was in the morning.

2

taakoblaa t1_iugbhjg wrote

Oh this is so funny. I was just telling my husband about how New Milford used to be much bigger before pieces were broken off to create Brookfield, Sherman, and Washington. And how a town needed to have a Congregational church to be a town.

1

CTHistory42 OP t1_iugc0og wrote

Just for the record, New Milford is still the largest town in CT in terms of acreage. However, it did not give land for the formation of Sherman. That distinction falls to New Fairfield. They did give land for Bridgewater though.

1

Personal-Ad-7407 t1_iuggd7z wrote

Another fun look is Windsor, which later splits into Windsor Locks, East Windsor and Ellington. Later, South Windsor splits off from East Windsor.

On this map, Windsor is on both sides of the CT River. Am I correct that Haddam is the only town that still is on both sides of the river?

3

infiniZii t1_iuhgsck wrote

I'm pretty sure Naugatuck existed at the time of this map. The river was the Naugatuck river but the borough isn't listed. It was tiny at the time though so they probably just didn't include it.

2

GunnieGraves t1_iuho7ig wrote

Love how large Windsor was before they parceled it out

1

CalligrapherDizzy201 t1_iuhrr39 wrote

It’s really cool to walk through the woods and see an East Hartford/Wethersfield town line sign followed, about a half mile later, by a Glastonbury/Wethersfield town line sign. There’s even a reason for it but I don’t remember what. I’ll go look and update.

ETA: https://www.realhartford.org/2019/09/18/east-of-the-river-to-wethersfield/

Turns out it was a flood. This is a cool article about the area.

2

singalong37 t1_iuil4b0 wrote

Hartford might be in better shape today if West Hartford, East Hartford and Manchester were all still part of Hartford.

1