Submitted by teknowledgist t3_11s21kd in DIY
My concrete basement floor has multiple, sizeable areas of crumbling. It has clearly been patched multiple times, but those are mostly failing too because the underlying concrete just keeps failing. Based on my neighbors' basements built about the same time (during WWII) it seems a lot of the concrete in that period was bad. (My walls are block and OK.) There is a french drain around the outside, and although we rarely get standing water on the floor, the basement is humid and often has water in the sump pit. It will never be a finished basement.
There is no good external access to the basement (just a couple small windows in the back), so any new pours will have to be manually hauled and mixed down there. Also, the headroom is minimal, so I would really like to avoid raising the floor height.
It would be a Herculean effort to re-pour a even quarter of it all at once, so I figure any work I do will have to be piecemeal and over a number of years.
Given that, I've been considering removing sections and replacing it with paverstones or brick. I could take them down over time and lay them when I have enough to cover the next section I need to remove. There is no risk of frost heaving or roots, so they should stay in place once set. When ever it comes time to replace the cast iron drain(s) that crosses the entire basement (and which ironically seems to be in the "good" cement), the pavers would be easy to pull and replace.
Is that ridiculous? Is there a structural problem or a code violation with doing it?
Thanks!
1feralengineer t1_jcbdbel wrote
The walls are block, but I assume they were laid on concrete footings. The first thing I would do is have the footings inspected; then make a decision about the floor.
My thoughts on the floor would be dependent on a long term radon test. If you have radon, then sealing the floor becomes a much higher priority than the amount of effort required.