Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kompootor t1_je269zu wrote

Reply to comment by Shiningc in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc

> People believing the corporate PR that they have an AGI or "proto-AGI" are incoherent. Why would they release such a thing to the public? Why would they let their rivals have access to such a revolutionary tool? ...

> So, either a corporation wouldn't release an AGI to the public, or they don't have one. ...

> And in order to counter this, we'll need non-profit organizations making AIs, and not just believe whatever PR that the corporations come up with.

[Edit: See edit above. Even if I was quoting sentences in context, I quoted it out of context to the overall point of the post, which I realized last night and today. Apologies.]

3

Shiningc OP t1_je26lfd wrote

I said "or they don't have one". If you don't believe that AGI can be kept a secret, then they don't have one.

1