DentedAnvil t1_jczvjxf wrote on March 20, 2023 at 8:35 PM

#100 is interesting. "2028 - Predictive policing: AI-driven tools analyzed crime data to predict and prevent criminal activity, enhancing public safety and resource allocation more effectively than traditional methods." Predictive policing... wouldn't that require preemptive due process?

marcandreewolf OP t1_jczz7kq wrote on March 20, 2023 at 8:58 PM

Minority report … 😅

Thatingles t1_jd0046f wrote on March 20, 2023 at 9:04 PM

Rebranded as interventions, yes of course it will. It is inevitable, especially if you could monitor social media in real time to see who is signaling an imminent crisis.

NLwino t1_jd03kav wrote on March 20, 2023 at 9:27 PM

It will also be used to by governments to predict who might be potential opposition. Even many years ahead. There is a youtube video with that story line, where they use drones to kill anyone who is might become a potential opposition leader when they are still students.

[deleted] t1_jd1c0tw wrote on March 21, 2023 at 2:46 AM

[removed]

Jasrek t1_jd1ze65 wrote on March 21, 2023 at 6:59 AM

> Predictive policing... wouldn't that require preemptive due process?

Depends on how you do it.

For example, the model might say "a crime is likely to occur on this street on these days". So, assign a police car to hang out there on those days - you use the presence to prevent the crime from occurring.

Longing4SwordFights t1_jd00fxd wrote on March 20, 2023 at 9:06 PM

I think it's in reference to security. Facial recognition software and ability to access one's pulse temperature breathing pattern their body language these things are starting to be developed for people who have seizures to know that they'll be happening before they start so the person can lay down. Think of like an artificial dog for seizer patients. If you take that technology and perfect it you could put it into any camera system with the right sensors and it might be able to tell you if someone's about to shoot up a place or is thinking about robbing it for harming somebody. The data can be used to preemptively signal an artificial police officer. If one is actually on the scene at the time given its artificial, all the information can be calculated almost instantaneously and imagine someone pulling out a gun and their shot with pinpoint precision before they even get the gun out of it's holster all the way. Now imagine if this system was engaging every single person in the room with that exact precision of understanding and ability to read a scene. It would make a lot less mistakes than a human. Not saying I condone it but I could see that as a possible future scenario