Submitted by Rofel_Wodring t3_11nnof6 in Futurology
Rofel_Wodring OP t1_jbo3n5z wrote
Reply to comment by ROSS-NorCal in As a techno-nihilist who thinks that AI is our only way out of dystopia: by Rofel_Wodring
John, the bloodthirsty moron who wrote the Book of Revelation, was an sociopathic incel stoner whom even Diogeneses would think was annoying.
And yet, so many people treat that loon's Biblican horror fanfiction as some kind of revelation.
ROSS-NorCal t1_jbo9203 wrote
Yeah... because it's not about him. He wrote what he saw and was told. His personal failings, if any, simply make him human.
You can judge him. The way you do that leads me to believe that you're a liberal, condemning people on one hand while preaching tolerance for other people to follow.
If he was an incel, a stoner, or even gay, would that make him less credible?
Rofel_Wodring OP t1_jboakzc wrote
>Yeah... because it's not about him.
lol, nah, that book was TOTALLY about him, or more specifically, his dumbass incel prejudices.
I'm familiar with 4chan fanfiction, and that's what the Book of Revelation comes off as. A revenge fantasy from some maladjusted manchild seething how the Romans pantsed him in front of that cute teenager.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments