Submitted by KJ6BWB t3_yhn4ql in Futurology
Sometimes_Stutters t1_iug667x wrote
Fun fact- “Rare Earth” materials are not at all rare. They are actually very common in the earths crust.
KJ6BWB OP t1_iug7xur wrote
Very common, they just require high technology to get to and China controls most of the available deposits we know of.
Rough_Idle t1_iugbyw0 wrote
The headline alone was enough to make me wonder how big a brick this news is dropping in certain Chinese trade ministries
cchiu23 t1_iugzple wrote
China produces the most phosphorus too lol
MrDuhVinci t1_iuhc12r wrote
Every article you read about technology here is likely very tentative and far from proven for real-world usage. No doubt a 'few' Chinese Scientists will be ordered to investigate its potential as a practical alternative to parts of their 'rare-materials' industry... but they won't be running around in a panic until it becomes even a modest possibility.
13Wayfarer t1_iugqk9s wrote
Ring of fire in Ontario
ElJamoquio t1_iui58q2 wrote
> they just require high technology to get to
mmm, they just create 3000 lbs of toxic waste per EV-traction-motor built.
It's not that high tech, it's just toxic.
4t0mik t1_iugt8q5 wrote
I'm a betting Russia has a lot too.
cchiu23 t1_iugzjct wrote
They're also experts in refining them
[deleted] t1_iuh8fvf wrote
[deleted]
Alex_2259 t1_iugjho0 wrote
Doesn't bode well for the future of humanity.
I forgot, this sub is filled with China worshipping bots. Even if they're humans that's a bot mindset
[deleted] t1_iugm3of wrote
[removed]
84121629 t1_iugs0c3 wrote
Unless google is lying to me, tetrataenite is only found in meteorites.
DecentChanceOfLousy t1_iugw72t wrote
Before this research, yes. But tetrataenite isn't a rare earth metal, rather it's a substitute for rare earth metals.
WhooshThereHeGoes t1_iuhhx55 wrote
Don't look up.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments