Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DukeLukeivi t1_iwxk0ql wrote

Reply to comment by cornerblockakl in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin

No, because it doesn't take a genius to repeat answers that have been internationally known for decades. Carbon based global warming was being discussed in scientific papers during the Civil War, Ford had all electric vehicle prototypes in the 50s, Carter put solar on the White House in the 70s.

Did you think you were intelligently calling people out here, Mr.s Dunning Kruger?

13

cornerblockakl t1_iwxnxls wrote

Intelligently? Of course not. Logically, yes.

−6

DukeLukeivi t1_iwxt600 wrote

Logically strawmanning basic scientific literacy as Dunning Krueger r/iamverysmart so you can straight up Dunning Krueger r/iamverysmart at everyone in thread whilmst'd've contributing nothing - logically. Yep.

8

cornerblockakl t1_iwxwycl wrote

I hope you are a young lad and will pray every day you live to a ripe old age.

−9

DukeLukeivi t1_iwxxnhc wrote

Reading will benefit you and the rest of humanity more than praying ever will, do that instead.

7

cornerblockakl t1_iwxy3fz wrote

I’m an atheist. It’s an expression. I just hope in 30 or 40 years you realize neither you nor scientists can predict the future. (A very simple concept)

−4

DukeLukeivi t1_iwxyr4e wrote

Humanity has predicted eclipses and global rotational variances (zodiac procession) since antiquity? Fundamental laws of physics don't change over time - results of their interactions are completely predictable.

3

not_a-mimic t1_iwxz07x wrote

Don't scientists predict the weather? And when eclipses happen?

3