rocketeer8015 t1_ixyjvtf wrote
Reply to comment by lunchboxultimate01 in Human Trial to Regrow Mini-Livers in Patients with End-Stage Liver Damage by lunchboxultimate01
Hmm, that’s a very well thought out response. Do you have a counter example of a medication or procedure that’s as important(life saving) as insulin yet cheap and affordable in the US?
You make it sound as if insulin is a outlier, but I can immediately think of another example with an even wider scope: childbirth in a hospital. Same theme, captive audience(if your pregnant you are going to give birth in the best case), same result, high costs.
lunchboxultimate01 OP t1_ixzdu75 wrote
I think you've missed my point. Healthcare pricing in the U.S. is certainly out of whack due to a fractured, bureaucratic system, which makes coverage through insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare important for patients.
My intention was to show the motte-and-bailey fallacy, which was the following:
A1: This medical advancement will just bankrupt families for generations.
B: I don't see why. People will be able to get it like they do organ transplants (or any other medical procedure because it will be covered by insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare).
A2: Well insulin is overpriced...
A1 and A2 are not the same argument. The fact that A2 is correct does not make A1 correct. Additionally, B has not been disproven.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments