Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TheHiveminder t1_iyjmgkz wrote

It wasn't even actually simulated. This entire article is clickbait for the stupid.

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=13181

> All they did was perform elaborate SYK calculations on a classical computer, together with simulations of noise on the Google quantum computer, trying to find a possible calculation on the quantum computer that would have signal, not just noise. Once such an N=7 SYK calculation was identified, they used a 9 qubit quantum computer and the noisy result matched the simulation result from the classical computer, exactly as expected.

7

dflagella t1_iyjnzfv wrote

I mean, what kind of simulation is there other than math on a computer

6

TheHiveminder t1_iyjq632 wrote

One that actually models something. A more correct title would be "quantum computer confirms solution to a 10 year old equation previously solved by classical computers, that implies wormholes may exist"

7

mermansushi t1_iykrfex wrote

The journalism on this is ridiculously exaggerated, it if you care about fundamental physics it is interesting that they have created a model that is quantum but has the key properties of an ER bridge; it is basically a toy that they can play with to get ideas on how to tackle the real problem. This sort of thing is done a lot in physics and math, it’s not worth all the publicity but if you’re into the search it is interesting…

3