Submitted by dangler001 t3_10pifpq in Futurology
Responsible-Score893 t1_j6m3jle wrote
Yep, seems inevitable to me too.
I think your S1mone example is interesting but I think that step could be skipped and each film will have a totally unique AI designed for it. So films no longer have 'actors', they just have the characters unique to that story.
dangler001 OP t1_j6m5qp2 wrote
for the most part I agree with you, except 'Hollywood' loves having their big name stars. I'm pretty sure the theory is that it's easier to promote an already popular brand. Think like, just about any Marvel movie that comes out will break the Billion dollar mark, simply by being another Marvel movie.
Although, that may just be a relic of the past (the future's past, our present) due to movies' budgets. Once all movies cost the same to make (I'm assuming cheap as dirt) maybe the movie culture will change. No more summer blockbusters, maybe they will adopt a 'spaghetti against the wall' approach.
No stars would be great, too many stars aren't all that great, and having known actors in a role can be distracting. And of course all the back room politics...
I'm hoping it becomes all about the writer, and the writer can be anyone. There will be a lot of shit out there, but hopefully we'll be able to sort through the muck better by then
Longjumping-Tie-7573 t1_j6nhpcu wrote
Eventually, the only 'star' of any consequence will be which AI made the movie. Instead of Kubrick fans you'll have Direct-O-Tron 37a fans.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments