Royal-Recognition493 OP t1_j6e5fra wrote
The main reason Google are hesitant and have no immediate plans to release MusicLM for public use is copyright issues.
In an internal experiement, they discovered that around 1% of the music generated was a direct replica of a piece of music is was trained on.
bogglingsnog t1_j6e7p7n wrote
Haha, just like a real musician :P
DeltaV-Mzero t1_j6eekyr wrote
Imagine a real musician being able to even answer that question. Lol
bogglingsnog t1_j6ehspk wrote
Anyways here's Wonderwall!
azyrr t1_j6f6bhq wrote
I will never not upvote this.
CYOA_With_Hitler t1_j6g4ews wrote
Yep pretty much, if you've ever listened to Kevin Parker(tame impala's) music, quite a few of his songs are almost entirely stolen.
Good example is Elephant from the album lonerism.
He just stole most of the song Queens Will Play by Black Mountain
elehman839 t1_j6epsdz wrote
Reminds me to this awesome old video: https://youtu.be/5pidokakU4I?t=50
MEMENARDO_DANK_VINCI t1_j6ilkdv wrote
Yes, exactly.
mennydrives t1_j6laisx wrote
Yo leave e1m1 alone
chcampb t1_j6gxspc wrote
Well, luckily, we also got really good at automatically fingerprinting music, why not just two-stage it?
If the music has higher than a certain uniqueness threshold, bin it and train away from it.
Difficult_Bit_1339 t1_j6foz9t wrote
It's just a really good cover band.
msndrstdmstrmnd t1_j6gvsrk wrote
Why can’t they just add a filter in post processing? Is there more to it??
jonathanrdt t1_j6ji87b wrote
I’m surprised it’s thought to be so good. I listened to most of the examples in the published research, and I found most to be unlistenable as anything but background music. The moment I focussed in it, I wanted to change it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments