allenout t1_j7s78j6 wrote
Reply to comment by Midori_Schaaf in A new lithium-air battery design promises unprecedented energy density | A potentially transformative technology for electrifying transportation by chrisdh79
Bear in mind, electric motors can be 95+% efficient while ICE cars are at best 25% efficient, so that means that ICEs are actually more like 2kWh/kg while metal air batteries are 1kWh/kg+, so a electric car would only need about 2x the size of full fuel tank as a ICE car.
SandAndAlum t1_j7t3xcw wrote
You also need to include regen. And the fact the tank has a weight.
1kWh/kg is roughly on par with a small reciprocating ICE.
allenout t1_j7t4ims wrote
The fuel tank is made from thin plastic so the weight is largely irrelevant.
SandAndAlum t1_j7t5ie3 wrote
They're still >20kg when plastic, and the last few I saw were steel and weighed as much as the fuel.
ctudor t1_j7wed8j wrote
i think ICE engine and specific parts add more weight than their electric counterparts.
solotryps t1_j7y84cg wrote
An ICE transmission also wastes a lot more power than a simple EV reduction gear
mrSunshine-_ t1_j7t4kxk wrote
Petrol density is something like 0,72, so it drops even more. In 50 kg petrol space you get 75kg battery.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments