Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ed_Hastings t1_j8ozf8n wrote

Being the father of a field isn’t the same thing as having ideas that are credible by modern standards. Obviously not everything he wrote is incorrect, but you can’t just take it as wholesale credible either.

4

genuinely_insincere t1_j8vbfik wrote

No that's true but you also can't just say it's not deep. Like what would possibly be the standard of a deep thought then? If he's the father of psychology he's probably going to have some deep thoughts.

1