Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

psychsafetyalliance OP t1_itsko1h wrote

"Harm reduction" is a good term if you're trying to get often-fickle public funding to help people who suffer from acute, negative impacts from taking drugs. People who suffer from overdose due to adulterated drugs or disease spread by dirty needles are definitely experiencing harm and need those harms to be reduced.

But Dr. Hart is right: drug use is a lot more complex than just harm reduction. One of the things that the professional drug people in our network sometimes talk about is the the positive counterpart to many "harm reduction" practices is that they maximize the benefits people get from using drugs.

A lot of social media platforms will kick you off if you say anything about benefit optimization being the result of many of the things we study and teach (a Facebook Ads expert recommended we use the word Safety in the name of our org for this reason), so in the name of not getting our accounts deleted, we've opted to be verrrrry careful about the language we use and made peace with this sub-optimal compromise.

8

ALC4202012 t1_itslt0r wrote

Ah, I understand that approach. Thanks for the AMA. Godspeed!

2

psychsafetyalliance OP t1_itsml8d wrote

Totally. We've also heard the term "risk reduction" or "risk management" used, which are probably a little better and would likely still be tolerated by major social media platforms. This has given us some good stuff to think on in regards to how we present what we do online, so thanks for jogging our brains on this.

5

ALC4202012 t1_itsruck wrote

For sure! Hart suggests "health and happiness" as an alternative term which is definitely good but is a little too far on the other end of that spectrum maybe. I think "risk management" is an excellent middle ground.

1