TheWritingPartner OP t1_iwccih9 wrote
Reply to comment by numerousiceballs in I am a writer and writing coach. Ask me anything about writing, storytelling, writing books, web copy ... and anything about the process of putting words together. by TheWritingPartner
Excellent question. Purple prose happens when we try too hard to develop a clever style.
When it comes to developing your own style and expressing ideas with flair, I have a saying: "Good is great."
Even the most elaborate prose is really just a collection of simple parts. Your challenge as a writer is to gather an abundance of simple details and insights and then arrange them in a pleasing and engaging way.
Let me give you an example, which I develop in my book The Elements of Writing. This passage comes from Tom Wolfe's From Bauhaus to Our House, a devastating critique of modern architecture:
"Every great law firm in New York moves without a sputter of protest into a glass-box office building with concrete slab floors and seven-foot-ten-inch-high concrete slab ceilings and plasterboard walls and pygmy corridors—and then hires a decorator, gives him a budget of hundreds of thousands of dollars to turn these mean cubes and grids into a horizontal fantasy of a Restoration townhouse."
That passage, I think you'll agree is filled with a dizzying array of details. can you imagine writing a paragraph so laden with style and pizzazz? Of course ... if you first gathered specific details, like these:
Every great law firm in New York
moves without a sputter of protest
into a glass-box office building
with concrete slab floors
and seven-foot-ten-inch-high concrete slab ceilings
and plasterboard walls
and pygmy corridors
—and then hires a decorator,
gives him a budget of hundreds of thousands of dollars
to turn these mean cubes and grids
into a horizontal fantasy
of a Restoration townhouse.
See?
If you're attentive and collect lots of ideas and details, you can create the same kind of dizzying style as the late, great Tom Wolfe, one of the creators of the influential New Journalism of the 1960s and 1970s.
numerousiceballs t1_iwcqnbp wrote
Thank you for the in-depth reply. I do really like the perspective of splitting up any sentence into many more minute fragments. As for myself, I have acted upon the premise that each sentence should carry a distinctive sound to it─may it vary in rhythm or used cadence depending on the written theme.
Read aloud I find it easy to quickly spot the details that do not fit into the established sentence structures. Although that raises another concern that I wanted to bring up.
There seems to be a great rift between the ability to carry the aforementioned pizzazz when feelings are involved, since sometimes in regard to those sentiments, less can be more.
As someone that mainly uses first-person POV, details can sometimes hinder the flow of, arguably, subjective interpretations from the readers.
Have you made similar experiences? If so, what are your tips and tricks to avoid the issue at hand?
Thank you for the initial answer; it was very helpful.
...
I do think that the post is to be verified by submitting the proof to the moderators in question with a direct message, but I do not want to spread any falsehoods here.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments