No the question is how far will the democrats go to keep aTrump out of office???? Great job on our boarder by the way dems.

Please treat this post as if it was very inflammatory.

The real question is who will his supporters go after and for what. Who knows what secrets are being held back and saved for a special occasion. This is only the beginning of political vendettas unleashed. I’m fairly confident there are Republican DAs with grand juries on deck. Anyway, decent joke.

Hard truths for the lefties to swallow.

That’s brilliant. Do you think I can get my lawyer to convince a judge that I am incompetent?

…and now we laugh!

He’s done a brilliant job of keeping himself out of office, the democrats don’t have to do anything

If Trump could read he would be very upset with this joke.

Isn't he being indicted for his deal with Stormy Daniels? It wasn't really a secret being held back.

The real trick is to be declared incompetent to be held responsible for past actions in a court of law and simultaneously be declared as the most competent person to be the future leader of the free world in the halls of Congress.

..the jury is still out on that

It's okay, according to him he was only "indicated".

Hard truths are simply hard to swallow. That’s why your mother couldn’t swallow you when she was told having a child runs the risk of the child being an absolute moron.

[removed]

No, he is being indicted for misusing business funds and other finance violations (including a claim that the money to reimburse Cohen for the deal with Daniels was "legal fees" to Cohen, rather than stating that it was for payment to Daniels). There is also a question about the money possibly coming from his campaign funds, which would be a further violation.

If Trump were to have cut a personal check from his own finances to Daniels, then I do not think anyone could call that illegal. It is the source of the funds and how they were transferred that is the problem (from what I understand), along with any coverup.

I might be missing something (especially with "more than 30 counts"), but that is my understanding.

Ah yes. Promoting violence. Good job representing why conservatives have much room for improvement.

Aren't you the punk that insulted my mother? Shut your cckscker, sock wad. Perfect name for you.

Isn't he a rapper?

No. I insulted you. Your reading comprehension is about the level I expect from a conservative. Rather than try to come up with a clever roast of your own, you say I should get shot; your intelligence is actually worse than I expect from a conservative.

And you're the punk being insulted by a mom joke? Wtf is a sock wad?

At least he doesn't have dementia

Promoting violence? Shot on a rock refers to ejaculating on a stone. About the level of comprehension I would expect from Sock Wad.

I heard there was evidence that proves his innocence that the DA totally overlooked. Even a statement from the porn star that said it never happened. The sexual encounter or the hush money she said never happened .

Ideally, whatever the truth is, it would come to light in the trial.

However, I have no confidence that will actually happen for this or any other high-profile case.

It’d be a shame if he took her to mediation to prove it happened.

[deleted]