Devittraisedto2 t1_j1al5tq wrote
Reply to comment by swheedle in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
"Useful" information to you is trivial to the rest because of how impractical it is to most people's lives. Im asking you the practicality of it and here you are being pissy because you don't have an actual answer on how this can be applied to daily life.
My apologies for inquiring too much on how this could benefit me, since it seems it doesn't benefit most people at all outside of "mayhaps there be a life changing injury on site of the non-life threatening incident"
True, the distinction is there, but it doesn't change anything much except for the people affected by it.
[deleted] OP t1_j1alkl3 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments