LuckyandBrownie t1_j9svzrx wrote
Reply to comment by bestaquaneer in LPT: When debating or arguing with someone and it’s going nowhere, ask them, “What evidence would it take for you to consider that you’re wrong?” If they say “Nothing,” then it’s time to end the conversation. by blowfishmo
Schrödinger’s cat has been perverted by popularity. It’s not that the cat is alive or dead it’s something else entirely. When someone looks at the cat it is forced into being alive or dead, but is currently something neither alive nor dead. It’s in a third state of being.
So your argument is wrong, and you had no idea why. If asked would you have said that it could be wrong because of a misnomer about superposition?
bestaquaneer t1_j9u1608 wrote
That’s a very long winded way of saying you don’t understand when someone is using an analogy.
LuckyandBrownie t1_j9u2t4p wrote
The point of an analogy is to illustrate a point, but your analogy is false so it doesn’t illustrate your point.
It’s important to understand the use of analogies.
bestaquaneer t1_j9u37g4 wrote
So what evidence would it take for you to consider that you’re wrong?
LuckyandBrownie t1_j9u3gev wrote
About what? Your analogy?
bestaquaneer t1_j9v2wdp wrote
Got it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments