Submitted by ykilcher t3_xycz6y in MachineLearning
master3243 t1_irhd9dj wrote
When the article was first posted here the top comment was insulting the paper and questioning how Nature reviewers were not scrutinizing enough simply because it was by Google.
I was having long discussions fighting for the paper and hopefully a video like this by Yannic will make people recognize that it's not all fluff and hype but actually a big deal.
rlvsdlvsml t1_iri172p wrote
It’s misleading tho bc it’s the same time complexity as current approaches but optimized more for gpu kernel compilation. Arguably the end result is just using a known algorithm to find a more gpu compiler friendly approach since the solution space started with all the operations used in the current approaches.
c0d3s1ing3r t1_irivfz4 wrote
Hey a 10-20% improvement is a 10-20% improvement
antiquemule t1_iriosbr wrote
Well, it took the editors a year to “not scrutinize carefully enough” so it’s not like they just waved it through.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments