Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kmkmrod t1_iycrolg wrote

Only the court can do something to stop it.

And it won’t “destroy our way of wildlife” even if it does get built. Extremist hyperbole doesn’t help your argument.

4

TheElevatedHero t1_iycrqs6 wrote

Go back to mass you gov fan boy.

−10

kmkmrod t1_iycrx0z wrote

I don’t live in mass. And I’m not a fan of government.

What does “destroy our way of wildlife” even mean?

2

IamSauerKraut t1_iycscct wrote

No more roadkill!

Bear with me as I try not to get goosed for telling bad yokes...

3

TheElevatedHero t1_iycsby2 wrote

Natural features and it'll be the first step towards tearing down massive chunks of the western Forrested area.

I'll put it this way, maine voted to stop this problem in 2014. We continued to vote against it. It was never legally approved but now that Massachusetts is running out of power, they feel it's nessacary to overpower our decisions.

There previous project was going to go from the border of Canada, all the way to mass. They have have changed the words for congress but it doesn't mean the project has changed. It's still going to put a massive dent in our natural eco system.

−3

kmkmrod t1_iyct69r wrote

> Natural features and it'll be the first step towards tearing down massive chunks of the western Forrested area.

53 miles is “massive chunks”?

> Much of the controversy over the project focuses on a 53-mile stretch of the corridor that would be built on working forest land between the Quebec border and the Forks in Maine. The remaining two-thirds of the project follows existing power lines created for the state’s hydroelectric industry almost a century ago.

And aside from that, you asked “can someone do anything…?” and my answer stands. Only the court can stop it.

1