Submitted by NonSecretAccount t3_1266wyv in Music
Comments
zgrizz t1_je7uw9l wrote
To think, somebody somewhere draws a paycheck for thinking up unbelievably stupid shit like this.
speebrun t1_je7vdgz wrote
Coldest take ever
Misanthrobbingmember t1_je7vh5n wrote
Is it naive of me to assume this article is trolling? If this is real, I despair for the human race
MagnificentBastard0 t1_je7vjj7 wrote
IT is moving from master/slave to manager/subordinate - so no acronyms have to change.
sorengray t1_je7w4yv wrote
đ¤Śââď¸
idontknowwhynot t1_je7xjjc wrote
I canât speak to this specific article, but work in legal and tech and have heard lots of complaints for âMaster Service Agreementâ and a lot of folks are phasing out that terminology for the same reason. Similarly there are a lot of people who donât like the terminology for âslaving a driveâ (adding a storage device as a subordinate of another storage drive).
Acceptable_Designer9 t1_je7y1gi wrote
Master Distiller
Master Plumber
Master court of Sommeliers
Master code
Master lock
Master cheif
Master chef
Give me a fucking break, shit is getting out of hand.
TheSkyking2020 t1_je7yzdp wrote
Lol. What a fucking lame article. I guess I wonât say master bus when mixing either. I guess we should also stop calling them slave drives in our PCs.
Edit read comments and saw they are phasing out master/slave terms for drives. Jfc.
TheSkyking2020 t1_je7z3yk wrote
You forgot masterba⌠wait thatâs one word.
[deleted] t1_je7z6qm wrote
[deleted]
blackfeltfedora t1_je80bdd wrote
I have never heard of a copy or duplicate recording referred to as a slave.
3pbc t1_je84z9z wrote
man/sub for short
MagnificentBastard0 t1_je8ce7d wrote
God dammit!
[deleted] t1_je8jkfk wrote
[removed]
falconhawk2158 t1_je8pg7g wrote
I think you meant master debater
Kwatta_Sigret t1_je8z54y wrote
One word: clickbait
Trichromeguillotine1 t1_je92ml3 wrote
What are we gonna do about Masta Ace...like he can say but.....?
HardlineMike t1_je96j83 wrote
Can we remove whoever wrote this article first?
BuckyDuster t1_je9lw3b wrote
Itâs a good thing the âwoke movementâ is purely rational and doesnât take things too far
idontknowwhynot t1_je9nxbf wrote
I mean, maybe this is a bit much⌠but also, is it really a hill you want to die on (not that Iâm suggesting youâre aggressively against itâŚmaybe you are maybe you arenât)?
If it bothers some people that much, is it really that big of a deal to maybe phase out that terminology? Maybe the normalization of the word âMasterâ watered down how fucked up it is for for one human to have that kind of domain over another human? Maybe it didnât. But I donât care either way and if we want to not use it, I can get on board with that even if it ultimately doesnât change much.
crystalsunsetcity t1_je9o144 wrote
absolutely! also- by focusing all their energy on the important problems, they can ignore the billion other issues humanity faces đđť
BuckyDuster t1_je9uicg wrote
50 years ago if oneâs sensibilities were that delicate to be offensive easily they would be considered mentally Ill or at least emotionally unstable. Just sayingâŚ
idontknowwhynot t1_jea3thz wrote
Thereâs a lot of things from 50 years ago that arenât acceptable today. Itâs called progress. You seem really delicate and like youâre offended by people maybe not wanting to use terminology that referred to human enslavement before it was used for pretty much anything else. Which is a problem still present in the world today, so maybe those words should continue to have the gravity of what they refer to as to not minimize the problem that it still is.
Changing the terminology we use has little impact on your life. So again, is that the hill you really want to die on? You seem awfully sensitive about it, and the rest of us are fully capable of saying âyeah, that makes senseâ and moving the fuck on. Just sayinâŚ
BuckyDuster t1_jeaa320 wrote
Nice try manipulating my words to your benefit, snowflake!
I guess you are also concerned about all the slaves who are right this minute working for you (you probably have no idea)?
idontknowwhynot t1_jeabjbx wrote
Youâre proving my point with your reactions here. This is easy. Just move on. Or continue to get all worked up. I really donât care. Only bothered to reply on the tiny shred of hope you might think about this later and realize it wasnât worth getting all pissy about.
Youâre not my enemy. I donât hate you. Just put yourself in someone elseâs shoes every now and then, yeah?
BuckyDuster t1_jeawbnu wrote
Ok, why then did you threaten my life because I hold a different opinion than you? Not very politically correct of you. Lucky for you, I donât give a damn so I am not offended of worried.
You are not my enemy either, Iâm just railing about words in many different contexts being banned because they were once used in a specific context that oppressed people.
Do you also want to ban books and control other aspects of how people think?
idontknowwhynot t1_jeayn5m wrote
Youâre not offended because youâre being disingenuous and know that âis this the hill you want to die onâ is a common English expression. As should be apparent by our lack of a âhillâ. You canât make a sound argument against my points, so you deferred to attacking something that has nothing to do with the arguments being made. Itâs a distraction technique, and you know it.
Quit your bullshit.
BuckyDuster t1_jebanng wrote
You quit your bullshit. Iâm 100% real, no bullshit
NonSecretAccount OP t1_je7ula8 wrote
This is so dumb