Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Rusnak52 t1_jcwbq8n wrote

Cutting tube tube stock to length ! Good man .

3

dontpet t1_jcwd1i8 wrote

So did he keep all his fingers? Me paps lost a few over the years in a similar role

9

CoochieMunch t1_jcwfnra wrote

I’m more interested that he wore his belt buckle on the side. I feel like it wouldn’t be as comfortable and I’m wondering what the reasoning may be.

6

YeahMarkYeah t1_jcwgoir wrote

Homie jeans dirty. You know he was workin hard.

3

MyVoiceIsElevating t1_jcwi2qb wrote

I asked OP’s grandpa, here’s what he said:

“So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on them. Give me five bees for a quarter you'd say. Now where were we, oh ya. The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.”

18

psychocopter t1_jcx1opx wrote

Gloves are more dangerous than going bare handed with machinery that spins. Youre at risk of getting the glove caught and yanked around whatever is spinning. If it spins, rotates, or operated on a belt/band never use gloves or any loose fitting clothing/loose hair.

10

csanyk t1_jcx4yyy wrote

People's pants got DIRTY back then.

1

AmazingMojo2567 t1_jcxv9bz wrote

He was probably making a hood living wage too back then compared to now doing the same job

2

MOOzikmktr t1_jcy0938 wrote

70s Chicago-style air ventilation was just a small open window at the back.

I wonder if the inside of his lungs looked like the outside of his pants...

1

egus t1_jcy09a6 wrote

All I see is tinnitus

3

HuginnNotMuninn t1_jczkkwa wrote

I'm a Union Pipefitter, I've worked in a wide variety of commercial and industrial projects. I assure you, if he was doing this on a job today he'd be wearing gloves, a hard hat, safety glasses at a minimum. Likely ear plugs and a face shield as well.

1