Submitted by susinpgh t3_10zsthg in Pennsylvania
BabyBatterBaller t1_j86t298 wrote
Reply to comment by NotTRYINGtobeLame in Voting Rights Victory in Pennsylvania by susinpgh
The political party that is being opposed is currently saying, and pushing through legislation that LGBT+ persons, by sheerly mentioning their status as a LGBT+ person, even in as small of way as mentioning they have a Husband/Wife, in the vicinity of a child is 'grooming children'.
Grooming children is a literal crime. One you can go to jail for. It's fucking stupid to then argue then that they wouldn't push to have LGBT+ persons in jail for it.
NotTRYINGtobeLame t1_j870c5i wrote
When you say "the political party" is doing something that seems to imply an official party position or support from a significant proportion of the party.
Can you prove either of those things regarding these grooming laws?
yeags86 t1_j87bcjx wrote
Well, FL and TX for starters. And Trumps bizarre video about “ending transgender” a week or two ago.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments