Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

djarvis77 t1_iqw06yg wrote

> Mail-in is insecure, its fact.

Prove it.

12

NewAlexandria t1_iqw0xf5 wrote

proof by gestalt: if there was not actually an issue, there would be no basis for so many people to raise outcry. Lying/deluded people would have had other people tell them 'shut up idiot' before the numbers got this big.

Note: this isn't an actual proof. You're just have problems and you want the internet to therapy/educate you

0

alaska1415 t1_iqy5zkb wrote

You have to be a troll. That lots of dipshits are in a lather over something they don’t understand does not make it an issue.

That so many people are primed to believe that the ONLY way they could lose was by fraud is the reason so many beloved this.

4

NewAlexandria t1_ir0k523 wrote

> I've been complaining about this for a couple decades, including and before the hanging chads. I'm anti-corruption, which sadly doesn't often give me the chance to plainly support any one party consistently.

0

alaska1415 t1_ir1ho33 wrote

You’ve been complaining about nonsense for decades? Cool.

3

VenomB t1_iqw369g wrote

When you submit your ballot at the machine, its at the point of counting and should have no time or chance for other people to even touch it until its counted.

When you submit your ballot via mail, that ballot enters the mail system and follows a procedure that involves other people with access to manipulation or removal. Its really not that damn hard to figure out.

What path does the ballot take? If it isn't directly to a point where nobody but the submitter touches it, then its already insecure. That's how security works.

−7

alaska1415 t1_iqy5tot wrote

Ok then, count them when they’re received. Nothing about mail in voting requires they be stored for some amount of time.

1