Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JPJRANGER t1_iv9v85a wrote

Probably a republican did it to play victim. Most liberals are educated enough to properly orientate a swastika.

66

PensiveLog t1_iva38nu wrote

Yeah could be like that guy who tried to spray paint the anarchy symbol onto his garage before setting fire to his camper to try to do an insurance fraud.

30

Reynard1981 t1_ivbqpzu wrote

Lmao you keep thinking that. There’s a huge difference between educated and intelligent. I’ve seen more than enough “educated” liberal democrats to know that they’re all “educated” morons.

−1

[deleted] t1_ivbr0tg wrote

[deleted]

2

Reynard1981 t1_ivbrbo4 wrote

Thanks for admitting that you’re a nobody.

0

JPJRANGER t1_ivbrlcz wrote

I said no one. Not nobody. You fail at basic reading comprehension.

4

Reynard1981 t1_ivc7wxy wrote

Ah, so not only do you acknowledge you’re a nobody, you also prove you’re an asshole as well. Typical extreme liberal democrat, no wonder why the majority of the country can’t stand you people.

1

ScienceWasLove t1_iva5s6n wrote

Was probably a democrat that threw a rock through the 4'x8' Fetterman sign in my neighborhood.

−11

IamSauerKraut t1_ivacq23 wrote

I get your sarcasm. The vandalism and theft of dem candidate signs says quite a bit about the "law and order" nature of republicans.

7

curatedaccount t1_iv9zoj4 wrote

>Most liberals are educated enough to properly orientate a swastika.

Is that something they cover at Yale? Advanced victimhood studies?

How is this comment supposed to make sense?

−34

JPJRANGER t1_iva06l1 wrote

They teach it in the same class that shows what colors the American flag is and how there are no thin blue lines on it.

42

stevez_86 t1_ivbtx8e wrote

I always took that as the police being an institution of the Federal Government, which they are not. Looking into the message they want to put out there, then yes, it says exactly what they want. A police state that enforces wealth distribution. Wealth distribution of minorities to white people.

If the Thin Blu Line flags were state flags, then whatever, but they show the American Flag. And they are not flying that flag for the FBI, or DEA, or DHS. It is State Police they are trying to say are as valuable and institutional as the states and original colonies in our culture. Police in the modern form were not part of the founding of the country. It started in the Jim Crow era and then grew exponentially after the Great Depression. It's old, but not foundational. And looking further into the history of the Modern Structure of the police it gets even worse. I would recommend anyone reading this far to listen on the series on Police from Behind the Bastards. After that the Thin Blue Flags look even worse.

1

curatedaccount t1_iva0pc8 wrote

I thought you where reaching for a reason to defend the vandals. Now its obvious.

−26

PM_ME_MURPHY_HATE t1_iv9vhw4 wrote

Occam's razor says it was a Democrat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

−38

PaApprazer t1_iv9yywi wrote

Recent history says it was a Republican.

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-fan-got-widespread-sympathy-113009999.html

54

WikiSummarizerBot t1_iv9vj3i wrote

Occam's razor

>Occam's razor, Ockham's razor, or Ocham's razor (Latin: novacula Occami), also known as the principle of parsimony or the law of parsimony (Latin: lex parsimoniae), is the problem-solving principle that "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity". It is generally understood in the sense that with competing theories or explanations, the simpler one, for example a model with fewer parameters, is to be preferred. The idea is frequently attributed to English Franciscan friar William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), a scholastic philosopher and theologian, although he never used these exact words.

^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)

7