Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

No_Tumbleweed_8157 t1_j6nmpck wrote

I guess it’s fair to say that Physicists will try to solve a PDE in cartesian space by parameterizing and reducing to an ODE in polar space where r could be constant.

I know Engineers are also usually happy to solve a problem graphically or by implicit forms. There are also times where engineers will just use one term of the small angle approximation and preemptively set bounds on the radius of convergence to θ<10°. (That’s fair, because an out of bounds θ means a bending modulus has already passed a buckling limit and the system is borked)

I don’t think it’s fair to say Physics student Classical Dynamics doesn’t use PDEs, though, especially since checking Lagrangian invariance of solutions only works for PDEs.

1