I feel like this article intentionally leaves out too much pertinent information. Including the fact they provided a photo of a sanctuary not recieving this bear as an addition to their own bear rescue community. And left till the end, without explaining, the efforts made locally to preserve the local bear population while it's numbers were declining.

These are exactly the types of articles I'd highlights and mark up after reading a hard copy to do my own research from.

It's the difference between a published opinion piece of fluff and a Real News Article (which provides Facts without the emotional tone and direction of belief being paved for you... Yuck!) Mislabeling thing will be the continued death of us