Recent comments in /f/Washington
PoopOnYouGuy t1_jeb67ol wrote
Reply to comment by Negan1995 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
You'll fit right in. I love it here compared to the south. It's very grey though so be ready for that.
SWAG0DL3G3ND t1_jeb55fs wrote
Reply to comment by Rocketgirl8097 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
It's a nice mix, just a little warm 🙂
Limp_Result7675 t1_jeb2o4f wrote
Reply to comment by Rocketgirl8097 in Would you support metrication in Washington? by Anything-Complex
One is volume, one is weight. Not the same. Keeping using your teaspoon- it’s just a 5ml spoon now. And a tablespoon is just 15ml
delamination t1_jeb20p6 wrote
Reply to comment by Rocketgirl8097 in Would you support metrication in Washington? by Anything-Complex
> A visitor is not going to be buying meat at a grocery store, they are going to be eating out.
Having done longer stays, gonna disagree with that. Grocery shopping in other countries is great for saving money and getting to experience the place.
> And if they for some reason were buying groceries they are going to be more concerned about the currency conversion than the unit of measure. Come on. I mean what benefit is there really?
Low-level: Gas in Denmark right now is 14.66 DKK per Liter. "What's that in FreedomBuxx?" You usually have the currency conversion squirreled away in your head when you're in a country for a while. If you can think in Liters, you can do "1 USD is a little under 7 DKK so it's a smidge over $2 and change for a liter" and you're done. If you can only think in gallons, you do that, and then also have to convert 3.78541 liters per gallon, which yeah, you can round to 4, but it's another conversion. And while you might have "a liter is a quart, for small use cases", it's a second conversion and this pretty much where brains blow up. (Answer: it's 8.12 USD/gal).
High-level: We're on an island of Imperial units, and that's isolating to commerce/tourism. It's fine that we're 'the exception' while we're the 800lb-gorilla (363kg) economy but, someday we may not be. We doggedly refuse to believe that there could be any long-term (generations-length) benefit to the local+world economy that could outweigh the (amortized over generations) costs... to the point that the idea of starting a systemic/slow conversion seems too much, because we can't see what's on the other side.
I get you're not convinced. I'm sorry.
Limp_Result7675 t1_jeb1esb wrote
The knee jerk - anti change response is strong!
I completely support this but I’m a scientist so already biased here. The only time I really have troubles shifting is temperature… I just like the finer scale of Fahrenheit for the range of human experience.
But in all this pushback what really amazes me is some of the following just seem to be ignored: Doesn’t seem to matter that we already have Km/hr and mph on our cars (just flip the emphasized unit). Or that anyone crossing the Canadian or Mexico border has to “make these conversions” Any mechanic worth their weight has a complete metric set as well as imperial. We buy liquids in liters (coke) a lot! The world has to make special tools for American products (or they don’t and we suck it up… eg cars) and Americans already make/use a lot of shit in metric (computer chips use nanometer as a scale) Also It’s just a name -switching to metric doesn’t mean the existing product has to be replaced. Your 200gal propane tank can still be filled with a metric volume of Propane
Will it require money to change signs - yes. Will a public awareness campaign be needed. Yes. Do I hear a lot of whining about “change sucks and any change is bad” - yes
Rocketgirl8097 t1_jeb05y2 wrote
Reply to comment by SparrowAgnew in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
That's the crux of it.
Rocketgirl8097 t1_jeazz0o wrote
Reply to comment by IceDragonPlay in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
It wouldn't. You'd still have to abide by federal law.
Rich-Juice2517 t1_jeazycy wrote
Reply to comment by Rocketgirl8097 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Ah yeah I'm across the mountains. We've got a lot of California's but I've been seeing an uptick in Texas plates lately
Rocketgirl8097 t1_jeazrdy wrote
Reply to comment by Rich-Juice2517 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Tri-cities has quite a few displaced Montanans over the years. Once they complete college they come on down either here or Spokane.
Rocketgirl8097 t1_jeazixb wrote
Reply to comment by Negan1995 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Come on out. I'm in a light red county in Washington but still light years ahead of the south and Midwest. (Our state's prettier too 🙂)
Ssttuubbss t1_jeaybv2 wrote
Reply to comment by IceDragonPlay in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
It will not change what certain federal agencies require. For instance, if you have a CDL license, you will still not be able to use pot and keep your job because the FMCSA says pot is bad. Marijuana will remain on the panel of drugs to test for.
SparrowAgnew t1_jeaxshm wrote
Reply to comment by Librekrieger in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
WA is an at will employment state. They can fire you if they believe you are impaired. There's no requirement for testing.
SparrowAgnew t1_jeaxi4l wrote
Reply to comment by IceDragonPlay in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
The drug free workplace act doesn't require drug testing, just anti drug policies.
morningafterpizza t1_jeaxai1 wrote
Reply to Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Nice!!!! To bad my CDL is a federal license :(
Librekrieger t1_jeavtub wrote
Reply to comment by n000d1e in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
The first three paragraphs focus on that, but the bulk of the article is more general, and talks repeatedly about impairment.
Being a NORML article, it belabors the point that tests don't tell whether a person is impaired at the moment, only whether the substance has been used.
So I'm interested in any answer to the question, because the article doesn't address it.
Wferguson11 OP t1_jeavnfm wrote
Reply to comment by AlternativeDragon in WA Teachers give me your thoughts by Wferguson11
I think I am open to most anywhere on the west side though
IceDragonPlay t1_jeavc0t wrote
Reply to Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
How does this affect employers with large federal contracts that require a drug free workplace?
Negan1995 t1_jeav661 wrote
Reply to comment by firelight in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
I do IT work. :) my girlfriend does school-based therapy for elementary/middle school aged kids.
firelight t1_jeauklk wrote
Reply to comment by Negan1995 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Once you’re settled it’s not so bad. I don’t know what you do for a living, but minimum wage is over $15/hr here and in Seattle it’s even higher.
The problem is lots of people expect to move here without any job prospects or housing lined up, expecting to be able to float for a long time based on the cost of living in Oklahoma or Arkansas or wherever they’re coming from, and that’s unrealistic. But it sounds like you’re doing your due diligence already.
Negan1995 t1_jeaswow wrote
Reply to comment by firelight in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Yeah I've looked into the housing and cost of living. I assume I'll be able to find a decent enough job to keep myself afloat. But won't be able to save as much as I do now more than likely. It's a change I'm more than willing to take. :)
Rich-Juice2517 t1_jeasw50 wrote
Reply to comment by firelight in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
I'm surprised we haven't gotten more yet from even Idaho or Montana
firelight t1_jeartsb wrote
Reply to comment by Negan1995 in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
Housing and the cost of living as super high here, but we’d be glad to have you. Expecting lots more red state refugees in the years to come.
Rocketgirl8097 t1_jeaq7hg wrote
Reply to comment by delamination in Would you support metrication in Washington? by Anything-Complex
A visitor is not going to be buying meat at a grocery store, they are going to be eating out. And if they for some reason were buying groceries they are going to be more concerned about the currency conversion than the unit of measure. Come on. I mean what benefit is there really?
Negan1995 t1_jeaoibd wrote
Reply to Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
God I really need to move out west sooner than later. I live in fucking Indiana, Washington is one of our top picks to move to though. Hopefully within 2 years.
Negan1995 t1_jeb6rm8 wrote
Reply to comment by PoopOnYouGuy in Washington Lawmakers Advance Legislation Barring Pre-Employment Tests for Cannabis by Important_Bad_9697
How often does it rain? That's my gf's biggest concern. Doesn't concern me a bit though. Lol