Recent comments in /f/WorcesterMA

AceOfTheSwords t1_je6fuir wrote

Tired of seeing this marketed as primarily a boon to Worcester. It is another expansion of transit options accessible to Boston residents, like just about every transit expansion the state decides to embark on. We're just lucky we were in the way. It completes a route from Boston to NYC that is no longer dependent on Amtrak. The vast majority of passengers will ignore Worcester. The improvements to Union Station will have a bigger impact on us than this. It's fine they're doing it, I just wish the presentation were more honest.

When will we see north-south rail? I want to be able to catch a train conveniently from Worcester to Providence, Lowell, or Nashua.

Probably never, is when. Or at least, not until the state's approach to transit radically changes.

36

melvintpunymeyer t1_je6edt3 wrote

I'm not saying it's perfect by any means, but I thought this link provided some helpful information regarding different parking and transit options. I live in the city and have been to a number of games. I haven't found parking difficult. Personally, I find the lack of available ridesharing services to be more of a pain. I live too far to walk to the Canal District, but close enough that an Uber or Lyft would be comparable to parking costs. I can never reliably depend on drivers to be available and have found myself stranded at the end of a night so now I just drive and pay to park.

2

Doom-Hauer451 t1_je6de2m wrote

I doubt anyone will be taking the train from western MA to Boston everyday unless it’s a high speed rail. It’s already what, an hour or more from Worcester to Boston via the commuter rail? And it’s not even guaranteed to run everyday. Worcester is convenient for migrating Bostonians because it’s cheaper and not unreasonably far for a work commute. Any further west and that appeal starts to break down.

23

masshole4life t1_je6ddig wrote

real talk, our society isn't in a position to give that kind of ultimatum.

we can't make teaching an underpaid bureaucratic nightmare and then turn around and tell teachers "if you don't like it then leave". that's absurd.

classroom distractions aren't new. first it was magazines and baseball cards, then it was handhelds like tiger games and gameboys, now it's cellphones.

just because the world changes doesn't mean that classroom distractions should be back on the menu.

unless phones are integrated into the curriculum they don't need this weird rabid insistence that they be allowed in the classroom.

some mombie wanting to text her son 50 times during the school day is not a good enough reason to have a whole class subjected to the buzzing and beeping of 25 other students' non-school-related communication.

2

masshole4life t1_je6a8lc wrote

>(certain council members)

why not name them? why treat them like some scary boogeymen whose names are never to be mentioned?

these are people driving local policy. if you believe that "certain members" are stifling progress in lieu of profit, call them out, please.

we should be having a conversation about it, not playing guessing games on reddit.

3

tico8562 t1_je67qma wrote

We must get at least 1-2 spam emails per week from students and (mostly) postdocs who are looking for roommates. Do you know your lab yet? If so, reach out to them so they can start forwarding you those emails.

We just had a new postdoc join our lab who lives in Boston with their spouse. They wanted to rent a local room to avoid city traffic and found one within a week or two.

6