Submitted by BlackWardz t3_10oe29j in askscience
iayork t1_j6i799b wrote
Some diseases could be eradicated if they were eliminated from every person. But many diseases have reservoirs in the environment (tetanus, Legionella, histoplasmosis) or in animals (West Nile, monkeypox, Ebola, MERS). Other diseases arise more or less spontaneously due to e.g. mutation (feline infectious peritonitis -- I can't offhand think of a human example) or recombination with related animal viruses (SARS, SARS-CoV-2). Since these diseases don't depend on remaining in the affected population, they wouldn't be eliminated by clearing them from that population.
>if we were lucky enough to get to a point where nobody would be infected by smallpox, would that mean the end of smallpox
That's exactly what happened, but there was nothing "lucky" about it - it was the result of a decades-long enormous vaccination and eradication effort by every country on Earth,
LifeLongNaturist t1_j6kjlsb wrote
And there is smallpox virus stored in labs in Russia and Atlanta for research purposes under the supervision of the WHO. It also has turned up in labs in Philadelphia in 2021 and Bethesda in 2014 as leftovers, could it be in other labs in the world? Hopefully it would be contained quickly if it ever escaped from a lab due to poor quality control, but sorry for those that would be affected.
https://www.science.org/content/article/six-vials-smallpox-discovered-us-lab
The Philadelphia lab virus was later identified as the virus used to produce the smallpox vaccine rather than the actual smallpox virus.
https://www.livescience.com/smallpox-vials-discovered-pennsylvania-research-lab
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments