Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_itqib3j wrote

Hello there!

Links from the domain present in your post are known to present a soft paywall to users. As a result, some users may have difficulty reading the linked content.

It may be helpful to provide a comment containing a synopsis or a snippet of the major points of the article in order to help those who may not be able to see it.

In accordance with the subreddit rules, please do not post the entirety of the article's contents as a comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

jstreim t1_itqnx60 wrote

Perhaps alternative means of accessing Baltimore other than freeways? Half that interchange could be demolished and the park and ride could be repurposed into the start of a transit corridor. It’s a revolutionary idea that I’m sure has never been proposed, publicly supported, but cancelled by Hogan out of spite.

67

kfri13 t1_itqoytg wrote

Anything to stop the drag racing on west bound I-70 will suffice. Speed bumps, a camera, literally anything but doing nothing would work.

11

jabbadarth t1_itqq8bc wrote

Seriously the red line running from 70 to bayview would have been amazing. Even just for the access to 4 different hospitals without having to drive and park would almost make it worthwhile. Add in access to the harbor, canton and fells and we could have been well on our way to a functional transit system.

38

zombiereign t1_itqqt16 wrote

Maybe do something about that godawful merge from 70 onto 695 (going to Towson) where everyone needs to alternate to get in and no one seems to want to (or know how to) do it

163

D0NNIENARCO t1_itqsyk5 wrote

I really wish they'd put a partition or bollards up along the first and last ~quarter mile of the 83/695 merge.

Way too many assholes trying to ride the 83 exit lane then slam on the brakes and merge in at the last second.

Also way too many dipshits that slam on the brakes the second they come around the bend at the beginning acting like the merge lane is lava and they can't touch it.

60

jstreim t1_itqt4z0 wrote

You’re right. The survey isnt helpful. There’s no mention of possible layouts, alternatives to driving, or discussions about capacity (don’t increase) vs safety (slower speeds upon approach, better merge areas)

14

Thatdewd57 t1_itqud9h wrote

I was curious if that was designed intentionally to throttle how much traffic is able to merge onto 695 at one time but yeah it’s ridiculous. Sometimes the park and ride is faster to get on 695.

13

Xanny t1_itr1ibd wrote

Build transit so the current infrastructure is fine and stop building more and bigger highways.

25

Good200000 t1_itr2oqz wrote

Blow the damn thing up and start fresh It’s always backed up as the present system is antiquated and backs traffic up for a mile at peak times

20

Resident_Structure73 t1_itr5j5t wrote

I think they did it backwards or too late. This state took just about every piece of free land to build more and more and more and more houses but did not think about expanding any roadways, now we all sit and bitch at each other in traffic. I started driving in 93, and I've sat in traffic on that side of 695 the entire time.

−4

Illustrious_Listen_6 t1_itr8o7p wrote

I just got back from Texas, and the highway infrastructure is so incredibly beautiful! The 695/I 70 interchange is crumbling, so dated/terrible to look at.

−9

Cunninghams_right t1_itre0hh wrote

stop using state tax dollars to subsidize sprawl and instead use it for transit and bike lanes... that's not an option on the survey? ohh.

36

Mustypeen t1_itrm2te wrote

Hey, I save 20 minutes every afternoon blowing down that lane from 695 IL to 83 SB. I’ve never slammed on my brakes though. There’s no need. Always some dipshidiot playing on their phone not paying attention leaving a 18 wheeler sized hole for me to slip into.

−9

abooth43 t1_itro555 wrote

Yea how dare they not stick right up the ass of the car in front, those are the people really slowing traffic down.

Or maybe people leave those gaps because it's inevitable some schmuck comes and tries to merge at the last second. If they have to stop in the adjacent lane it just makes it worse for everyone else.

And covering that 20 feet only takes a second once there's actually somewhere to go....

11

BlarghMachine t1_its0rq6 wrote

An 18-wheeler sized hole that the presence of your car squeezing in makes a much smaller space, causing the car that was giving distance - for a reason - to slam on their brakes. Foolproof! Totally not an accident waiting to happen, but you know who cares if your car’s not involved.

0

Animanialmanac t1_its27dx wrote

Is there some type of survey or feedback form, or is the DOT taking feedback in the Reddit comments? All is see is the paywalled Sun article. I gave up my Sun subscription for a Baltimore Banner subscription. I’m sure many residents don’t have either. This seems a little elitist to me if they only allow people with Baltimore Sun subscriptions to provide feedback. I drive this interchange regularly to and from patients west of the city. I drove it today and saw the back up of cars waiting to get through the alternate merge area, that could use improvement.

3

Alaira314 t1_its7tpw wrote

> I really wish they'd put a partition or bollards up along the first and last ~quarter mile of the 83/695 merge. > > Way too many assholes trying to ride the 83 exit lane then slam on the brakes and merge in at the last second.

I've had people on reddit(I want to say on this very sub) tell me that's how you do it in order to use the lanes to their full potential, and if you get in the slower lane "too early" then you're the one doing it wrong and fucking up traffic. 🙄 I'm pretty sure there's no such thing as "correct" driving, but rather a dozen different strategies that are all mutually exclusive and have everybody all pissed off at the "idiots"(ie, everyone else) who are doing it "wrong"(ie, not the way it works in their desired system).

4

Sugarbabedc t1_itsdjyn wrote

Those people are dicks trying to excuse their shitty behavior.

If that's the way to do it, why the fuck would everyone else choose to spend an eternity sitting in the turn lane? Why would the correct way be blocking traffic for the lane next to the turn lane?

I rarely sit in rush these days so it's been a while but the last time someone tried to "cut to the front of the line" so to speak in front of me, I blocked him and flipped the bird tbh. I don't have much tolerance for people who believe their time and energy are more important than everyone else's.

5

PrivateVffairs t1_itt6z1m wrote

Moved to MD in 07’ 695 was under construction and constant traffic. Left MD in 21’ 695 was still under construction and still in a state of constant traffic. I graduated HS & college had two kids in that time frame lol

3

ohamza t1_ittah2b wrote

They should get rid of it. Honestly I don’t even know why 70 extends past 695 to Leakin, that should just be a basic two lane road. Make it a smaller three way interchange where people can turn off and take 70 westbound from either direction.

0

gmp012 t1_ittxa9p wrote

Can we get like maybe...perhaps...like more cops busting the lawless aggressive driving out there?

0

Xalcoraan t1_ituxab1 wrote

Honestly I am tired of seeing road work. 95 is a disaster every day for example.

1

tacsatduck t1_itv1p3l wrote

Zipper merge when two lanes are combining or merging, great. That doesn't excuse people on 695 stopping the left hand lane on this multi-lane highway, because they want to drive up all the way to the point that exit 23A is Ying off before merging over, even though there is a really long solid-white line turning lane for a good distance before the turn. Every single morning back when I made that commute there would be stop and go traffic for all the different lanes on the highway because people were doing that.

1

neutronicus t1_itvqb9v wrote

> That’s called zippering and it’s the correct way to do it.

It's the correct way to use a merge lane, but the lane they're talking about is not a merge lane, it's an exit-only lane for an off-ramp.

2

down_up__left_right t1_itvs793 wrote

In addition to running through tunnels or on viaducts lights rails like the proposed red line can run on the street where needed. They do not require demolishing entire neighborhoods like large freeways and interchanges do.

The reason the Red Line doesn’t exist is because Hogan cancelled it in 2015 to shift funding to suburban roads.

1

moderndukes t1_itvttgl wrote

Yes yes yes, I agree and get it, more money to alternative transportation - however, this is a huge system interchange and given that it’s essentially I-70’s eastern terminus it’s important to be maintained and issues with it improved. This doesn’t seem to be another of Larry’s “but what if we just add more lanes” “solutions”

1