Submitted by hushpolocaps69 t3_yfpxjw in books
esgamex t1_iu4o0vo wrote
Think about how long a film would be if rhe book was filmed as written. You may know that screen adaptations of Jane Austen's work are popular. There actually is a TV adaptation if Pride and Prejudice that's faithful to the book. Not many people enjoy it. It's too long, and it doesn't meet the expectations people have formed in their heads.
All the same i think a tv adaptation of Harry Potter could be great.
pineapplesf t1_iu62zfw wrote
Not many people enjoy the BBC pride and prejudice?!?! News to me. It has a 95 audience score on rotten tomatoes.
esgamex t1_iu7cp9a wrote
I was talked ng about the 1980 one. Is that the one you're referring to?
pineapplesf t1_iu7fape wrote
The PBS one? It's not that lowly rated either The 1995 BBC version is super popular, as far as I'm aware, and very book accurate.
esgamex t1_iu7kskq wrote
Yes the 95 version is super popular, but it's not a filming of the book scene by scene as the 1980 one was.
pineapplesf t1_iu7q508 wrote
The 95 verison makes very few deviations and is longer than the 80 verison. So I don't think the length or incorrect expectations is why people like the 95 verison more. It's accessibility and ubiquity probably plays a bigger role in it's popularity.
ActonofMAM t1_iu6oufj wrote
I came here to say this. 6 hours to do full justice to a fairly short novel.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments