laconicflow t1_j0yc2fk wrote
Reply to comment by That-Requirement-285 in Pro-tip: If a well reviewed book has a Goodread's rating of around 3.5 then it's usually interesting by Proper_Cold_6939
I think the point is that Hannibal wins.
That-Requirement-285 t1_j0yc9gl wrote
No kidding but it felt like it was written by shippers.
I genuinely liked the last two books, and think Hannibal Rising got the worst reputation, but they’re not as good as the first two.
laconicflow t1_j0yhqvs wrote
I never read Hannibal Rising, just the other three, all of which I liked equally. the twist at the end of Hannibal was not something I soming one bit, I took it to mean he'd won, he's a bad guy and he won by brainwashing clarice, it wasn't that she'd always been in love with him.
Just my thought. Is Hannibal rising worth checking out?
That-Requirement-285 t1_j0yjrds wrote
It’s a Hannibal backstory that I think the author wrote mostly because he feared that somebody else would write it. It’s not as well-written as Red Dragon or Silence of the Lambs, but I think it tied in nicely.
laconicflow t1_j0yleig wrote
Your explanation is why I haven't read it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments