Submitted by TheKarolinaReaper t3_zwbk3d in books
QuothTheRaven713 t1_j1w6kus wrote
Reply to comment by laurpr2 in I just finished The Giver today. It was as good as I had anticipated. by TheKarolinaReaper
I don't even think any book should be banned from curriculums. I do think that books that are assigned should be appropriate to grade level, the same way I wouldn't approve of someone taking a 9 year old to a PG-13 or R-rated movie. Would I feel that's inadvisable, sure, but I wouldn't call for banning it.
There's a difference between feeling some books should be taught in curriculum at any appropriate age level and thinking they should be banned. If a middle school doesn't teach about a book, but a kid finds a book that's out of their usual age range in the school library or something and decide they want to read it on their own, then that's fine as long as they're aware of what they're getting into.
laurpr2 t1_j1w89or wrote
>I don't even think any book should be banned from curriculums. I do think that books that are assigned should be appropriate to grade level,
But those are just two sides of the same coin. If you deem that Stephen King's "IT" isn't appropriate for middle schoolers, then you've "banned" it from the curriculum.
None of these "book bans" ever prohibit kids from ordering the "banned" book off Amazon or getting it from their local libraries or pirating an ebook. They're free to read what they want without any repercussions from the school. "Book bans" (despite the inflammatory language surrounding them) boil down to restricting what's on the curriculum and stocked in the school library.
bigthink t1_j2473fn wrote
One is deciding not to use something. The other is disallowing it from being used.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments