EnjoyTheNonsense OP t1_ixatizg wrote
Reply to comment by johndburger in Now he brings it up: Councilor worries ordinance requiring info on police surveillance technologies could mean release of 'classified' information year after he voted for it by EnjoyTheNonsense
You honestly believe that the commissioner does not have a clearance and does not get briefed if there is an increased threat to major cities? It is pretty reasonable to expect that a major city police department has several officers with secret or top secret clearance. This is not rocket science.
johndburger t1_ixavaw4 wrote
It’s possible, even likely. But none of the information we’re talking about here is classified, which is why Flynn’s comment is bizarre grandstanding, which is what Crockford was reacting to.
EnjoyTheNonsense OP t1_ixax7ui wrote
>BPD "is not like the CIA or the US military, it should not be handling classified information," she said.
Emphasis added to help you out. The notion that someone who is part of the process in creating this ordinance actually believes this should inform you that she has no idea how things work.
Let me know if you need me to get out some crayons to help you further.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments