Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j75ynrm wrote

[deleted]

−11

st4n13l t1_j77430x wrote

You forgot the /s at the end of your comment. Obviously there's no way that's a serious comment made after looking at the graph.

3

aussie_punmaster t1_j77r6af wrote

You forgot that people survive sarcasm without a /s marker.

As you say yourself this is obviously sarcasm.

2

92835 t1_j76yndx wrote

Did you actually look at the data? They are very clearly and visibly unequal. Every bracket under 40% there are more women than men, every bracket above more men than women.

For all brackets above $100,000, there are over twice as many men as women, in the highest categories as much as 10x

This data very visibly shows income inequality between the genders

−2

jthistle02 t1_j774gpp wrote

There’s nothing clear about this data

5

92835 t1_j774ruk wrote

Slightly confused by everyone saying this, I agree it could be presented/explained a lot better but it’s still not that hard to understand

−2

jthistle02 t1_j774x4p wrote

Yes it is

0

92835 t1_j7754yj wrote

Agree to disagree I suppose, whether or not something is comprehensible to someone isn’t really a point one can argue about

2

Jolly-Feed-4551 t1_j77bpfw wrote

We can't/shouldn't argue if you can comprehend something, but arguing about if something is generally comprehensible is different.

3