Submitted by katspike t3_zemg15 in dataisbeautiful
mfb- t1_iz8u7nc wrote
Reply to comment by katspike in Relative energy cost of light colours [OC] by katspike
These numbers apply to a specific, specialized light bulb from one manufacturer. The electricity consumption will be low for blue because the light bulb will be very dim overall if you set it to blue. That doesn't mean blue is the cheapest light to produce. Your picture is very misleading.
katspike OP t1_iz98jgg wrote
Thanks for the feedback. As I stated, the source is Philips Lighting/Signify - one of the biggest lighting manufacturers in the world. Their Hue range is hugely popular and many people will be using their lights to decorate their homes for Christmas. I pondered making the title: "Relative energy cost of Philips Hue", but I thought "light colours" was more search-friendly.
How different would the results be for other brands of colour-changing RGB bulbs?
mfb- t1_iz9c01t wrote
The post should stand on its own, without the source comment. Nowhere in the title or the post is any indication that this is about colour-changing RGB bulbs, or one specific product.
I expect significant differences between products, but that's not even the main problem.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments