Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

GeT_Tilted OP t1_j8s265m wrote

> Impacted products will be listed as “535 Power Bank (PowerCore 20K)” with model number A1366.

Edit 1: Fill this form if you are eligible for a refund

96

GENOCIDUS_REX t1_j8s6kz7 wrote

Anker used to be my go to brand for cheap electronics but after their spycam disaster with Eufy and now this, I don’t think I’ll be a repeat customer.

250

sudifirjfhfjvicodke t1_j8sa74f wrote

I get the Eufy camera concerns, but practically every major electronics retailer has had a recall over battery issues at one point or another. As long as there isn't evidence that Anker is systematically ignoring battery concerns or there are widespread defects across multiple models, I don't see a reason not to trust their batteries even after this.

187

GENOCIDUS_REX t1_j8sdstd wrote

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/02/ankers-eufy-admits-problems-with-unencrypted-video-access-pledges-overhaul/

Their “no cloud” security cameras would actually allow third party access to unencrypted streams.

It took 3 months for them to come clean about the issue. An absolute disaster from a security perspective - multiple, multiple failings were required for those products to hit market.

67

biggguy t1_j8sfl3o wrote

"with proof of purchase and order number". Given that power banks are often a disress purchase not made online, who keeps receipts around for such a low value item?

−15

GENOCIDUS_REX t1_j8shfo0 wrote

Honest mistakes are minor. This was not honest, or a mistake.

They marketed these devices as specifically “no cloud” security, because of the concerns over Ring and other devices like that.

Then it turns out that it was all made up.

Their devices sent images to the cloud. Unencrypted. AND SAVED IT THERE

Their devices sent video to the cloud. Unencrypted. For anyone with the right url to view.

There were numerous, numerous failings in the security model of this supposedly secure device. They knowingly went to market with it. They avoided owning up to it for 3 months. They continued to sell the defective product during that time frame.

This was not an honest mistake.

74

Boxed_pi t1_j8sjorz wrote

I got rid of mine immediately, with the exception of two that point towards the street.

I originally had ring until they got bought out by Amazon.

now I’m at the point where i can’t trust any company with my privacy so I’m in the process of building my own security camera network from the ground up. Having some problems with chip shortages but it’s going well.

21

danfinger51 t1_j8skdma wrote

I just got one of these a month ago for my trip to Kenya. Worked great for recharging mine, wife and friends phones. Didn't get hot at all. Any reco's for replacement? 2 x USB-C ports a must have.

65

tarnorgana t1_j8sni01 wrote

I contacted anker support and they have issued a full refund (waiting for it to complete) they also suggested the 537 as a replacement and offered me a 20% discount.

It's about 150g heavier, slightly more capacity and has a higher output.

73

Saoirse_Says t1_j8sodhm wrote

I used to use an Anker USB hub until it got extremely hot out of nowhere and fried my iPhone. I’m done with them lol

−4

SentientDust t1_j8spmti wrote

Oh great, I just bought a Power Core III 20k two weeks ago

3

ahecht t1_j8sqhbn wrote

That article is really misleading.

> The encryption scheme on the URLs also seemed to lack sophistication; as the same researcher told Ars, it took only 65,535 combinations to brute-force,

It only takes 65,535 guesses if you already know the serial number, which is a 16-digit non-sequential alphanumeric string that would take longer than the age of the universe to guess.

23

fargoadvice t1_j8st80p wrote

Off the top of my head, we purchased a PowerBank 500 Fusion at BestBuy in 2018, PowerCore 10000 in July 2022 at Walmart, both physically in the brick and mortar stores.

Neither had the whole gamut of Anker’s offerings, but it was nice being able to grab it off the shelf

1

fuzzywinkerbean t1_j8suho6 wrote

Part of me wonders if it was a disconnect between development and product marketing honestly. Dev had one direction from management and then marketing had to find an angle to push and someone heard they were local only, wires got crossed and here we are.

2

YoungsterJoey017 t1_j8sv27l wrote

it’s a big company. this is the most likely case, but people are quick to assume malicious intent.

regardless, i’m not gonna be scared to buy a battery pack because I’m scared they’ll intentionally put spying hardware inside.

1

F-21 t1_j8svjga wrote

I like my Xtar power bank, because it is actually using replaceable 18650 lithium cells, and is actually also meant as a 18650 battery charger that has a powerbank function.

I'm sure there are powerbanks that take a little less space for the same capacity, but on the other hand you can grab a couple more 5-10$ 18650 cells (from e.g. Samsung, LG, Panasonic) and expand your capacity by just swapping those out. Can't get more compact than the cell itself...

13

GoodMornEveGoodNight t1_j8svz1t wrote

I personally use a Romoss 30k. Dependable, economical, and reportedly uses high quality, sturdy plastic, and has cells sourced from the same plant that supplies iPhones, etc.

Dropped about 5-6 times from the top bunk to tiled floors. No issues, little deformation to the casing.

If you are asking about power banks that is.

I still use Anker cords in nearly all things.

2

BagFullOfSharts t1_j8sx7nd wrote

Yeah they’ve been pretty mainstream for a while now. I kinda miss when they were up and coming. Bought a lot of bricks and banks for great prices. I’ve still got a powercore 3k that’s flawless, think I paid $12 for. I still use it with my quest 2.

4

tionong t1_j8sxziq wrote

I bought my first powerbank from them in like 2013 and it still works. They were far cheaper and better than everything else on the market. Sad to see the Webcam thing. Fire thing seems par for the course for batteries now a days.

69

ahecht t1_j8t0nhx wrote

https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/30/23486753/anker-eufy-security-camera-cloud-private-encryption-authentication-storage

If you read in between the fearmongering:

> the way we initially obtained the address required logging in with a username and password before Eufy’s website will cough up the encryption-free stream.

> that address largely consists of your camera’s serial number encoded in Base64

> On the plus side, Eufy’s serial numbers are long at 16 characters and aren’t just an increasing number. “You’re not going to be able to just guess at IDs and begin hitting them,” says Mandiant Red Team consultant Dillon Franke, calling it a possible “saving grace” of this disclosure. “It doesn’t sound quite as bad as if it’s UserID 1000, then you try 1001, 1002, 1003.”

16

-RedXV- t1_j8t104t wrote

Will do! Anker has always been my go to but I did notice they're always more expense than others which I convinced myself that's good thing. I needed to buy another power bank because my wife is always taking the one that I use for work. She can just keep the old one now. lol

2

ahecht t1_j8t228b wrote

There are two different parts of the URL, one is a 4-digit hexadecimal number that has 65,535 possibilities, the other is the 16-digit serial number that has 43-thousand-million-million-million possibilities. The "researcher" was only able to brute force it in 65,535 tries because they had physical access to the camera and were able to read the serial number off the label.

2

GENOCIDUS_REX t1_j8t5dx3 wrote

Ah, not as bad as it first looked, but:

> he points out that companies don’t tend to keep their serial numbers secret. Some stick them right on the box they sell at Best Buy — yes, including Eufy.

I’m good with condemning this massive lapse/lie about “no cloud” devices.

Their original statements, from that link: With secure local storage, your private data never leaves the safety of your home, and is accessible by you alone. False. Facial ID images were uploaded to the Eufy cloud. All recorded footage is encrypted on-device False. Footage was not encrypted. At all. Only the url was encrypted, not the footage. This is also known as a lie

21

fuzzywinkerbean t1_j8tgxxf wrote

You'd be surprised how little executives know about the business going on below them, they just like seeing profits. I honestly don't think this was malice or Anker/eufy thinking they could hide it from people forever, it was an oversight. Oversight doesn't mean it is ok though at all! These sorts of things should be avoided and corrected when pointed out for sure. I just don't really see the benefit they would gain from knowingly lying about it.

2

KitchenNazi t1_j8tl9zm wrote

So the A1366 is being recalled. Lucky for me I have a A1244, which I'm sure doesn't share any of the same components.

38

KitchenNazi t1_j8tljdp wrote

I know everyone seemed to love Anker when they first started out but I had a lot of chargers that have died. You get what you pay for I guess.

1

GENOCIDUS_REX t1_j8tmzsi wrote

Someone fucked up in an egregious way. While shit rolls downhill, I believe the ultimate accountability lies with the executive product owners who allowed this defective product to be marketed this way.

Whether or not they knew is immaterial, they should have known.

3

frontiermanprotozoa t1_j8tpbf8 wrote

+1 . Their hdmi cables are always on spec (rare feat if you want 120 hz hdr 4k, even with much more expensive brands) and also have their high spec usb c cable and 4 port gan charger, both are 1+ year old and going strong.

2

do_do_do_do_do_do t1_j8tpvs7 wrote

I've had good experience with choetech even before anker had scandals

LTT basically slotted UGREEN directly into the sponsor position that Anker used to have

but more recently i've been most partial to ikea. you wouldn't think of them at first but they actually have some very good and price competitive offerings

1

Mittsu3 t1_j8ts9x0 wrote

I've been using this exact 535 (A1366) since november.

the only thing that has stood out, is how hot the gan brick can become when charging. after a full cycle, the unit seems to rival surface temperatures on the sun.

1

pileodung t1_j8tvpql wrote

I own an Anker.

And like ALL devices, it's important to read the directions likeeee where it says, unplug when fully charged. Don't use as a wall plug power bank to charge multiple devices.

I'm not saying Anker isn't to blame here, but we can't treat technology like it's invincible.

0

LordSalem t1_j8twc7g wrote

Used to have a nice Anker Bluetooth speaker. It almost set my house on fire. Their customer service was like "thanks for telling us! Ok bye"

11

fuzzywinkerbean t1_j8tx5xs wrote

Oh we are completely in agreement trust me. They definitely fucked up. Fucking up with people's data is massive, let alone personal CCTV footage.

I was just saying I don't think the management at Anker decreed "we must store this data secretly for our own purposes and never tell anyone! Muahahaah" like some people seem to think about this news.

Management are ultimately responsible for this oversight and someone below didn't do things right for sure. It is just Hanlon's razor laid out by a large corporate.

1

saintdudegaming t1_j8txlsw wrote

Any recommendations other than Anker these days? I don't recognize any of the current brands.

1

N2929 t1_j8ty2xg wrote

Haven't some models of their power banks just been duds. Like I have heard about how some of the power banks only lasted a year and or were fire concerns.

0

TheStephinator t1_j8u3yz5 wrote

The good news is that my battery bank isn’t the recalled model number. The bad news is I’m probably going to need glasses soon.

2

killingtime1 t1_j8u48it wrote

I also use Xtar and ask the pros are true. However some competitors charge a lot faster (I have a XMI one that can charge laptops at full speed) and are lighter/less bulky for sale capacity. Xtar is lot better in the sense you can carry a larger capacity on planes as each individual battery won't be over the limit

4

biggguy t1_j8ujq60 wrote

I know it's different for everyone, but that's not usually something I'd be particularly careful about receipts beyond the first month or so ; when they usually live in a pile on the kitchen table (single guy).

1

ravenpotter3 t1_j8uqit0 wrote

Darn I don’t know which one I have but I have one of those now I need to check

Edit: good news it’s not the one I have

1

Minionz t1_j8usypx wrote

I still buy RAVPower power banks, despite Amazon banning them. Still make good products. Anker are nice since they are decent quality and next day delivery from Amazon. Ravpower still seems to dropship from amazon, which is kinda weird, but I'm told that the warehouse shipping didn't ban RAVPower just the webstore portion.

2

frogmicky t1_j8v16r7 wrote

Anyone have problems with their chargers or type c cables?

1

bing_bang_bum t1_j8vjnd3 wrote

Well shit. I have one of these somewhere in my apartment fully charged but I don’t know where it is.

1

jonnipe t1_j8vpj7a wrote

I have been using zendure recently and have not looked back. They are also significantly faster To charge than the ankers

2

F-21 t1_j8waz1e wrote

There's not much to it, it's just a magnetic case/shell into which you place the batteries. Xtar even allows you to use smaller batteries in it as well (half-size 18650, forgot the correct designation), can't really mess it up in any way as far as I know.

I bought it as a charger for 18650 since I have some lithium battery flashlight, but the power bank function ended up being even more useful.

Some new flashlights have a reverse-charging powerbank function too. Probably Wurkkos of Sofirn. Though don't fall too deep into that flashlight enthusiast rabbit hole. If you've never owned an enthusiast flashlight, it's amazing how powerful they are compared to the stuff they normally sell in stores. And interestingly, quality western made flashlights are very rare, the chinese are the best in this field and you can get the best flashlights easily on aliexpress.

1

dereksalem t1_j8wx586 wrote

I realize this seems a bit like a different segment, but the 737 is fantastic. I have a few powerbanks (used to travel for work), but the 737 goes on sale pretty often for like $110 (it's currently $149.99 but with a $40 coupon on Amazon) and has 24,000mAh, 140W output, 2 full-speed Type-C and 1 Type-A port, and a helpful display that shows exactly how fast it's charging/discharging. I've only had this one for like 2 months, but it's been great.

It's hard to find a powerbank that charges as quickly as it discharges...but I've charged this thing at 120W (fastest charger I had) and I have no reason to believe it wouldn't charge at 140W if I had a charger for it. It's the only powerbank I've owned that can charge my MBP at full speed through the MagSafe (which is 100W, IIRC, on the 14" M1 Pro MacBook Pro).

3

detectiveDollar t1_j8xbool wrote

I agree with that, I think the other commenter meant that this isn't some NSA-style deliberate spying on the part of Anker/Eufy. Some have framed it that way, as if Anker/Eufy is going to put a secret camera and wifi transmitter into a power bank.

1

detectiveDollar t1_j8xcskh wrote

True, this one may not be designed to get rid of the heat buildup from charging and passing power through at the same time. They may need to redesign it to be larger or disable the ports when it's plugged in.

1

just-bair t1_j8y1to7 wrote

I have a kinda old power bank from them and it still works really well. It’s nice that they do a recall of a defective product. I’ve heard that they’ve been in some shady stuff lately so that’s not a good thing. But in general I’m happy of the products I bought from them even if it’s not that many products

1

CaptRon25 t1_j96xnfz wrote

> refund offered with proof of purchase

Isn't having one proof of purchase? Someone had to buy it

1