Submitted by memeguy66 t3_zzs5t1 in gaming

Hello everyone I got a question about the persona 5 canon(probably has been asked already) but it’s more of how I should view it(unless other wise) Anyway here’s the ways I could view it

  1. Persona 5 royal is canon to strikers but due to development stuff(starting development at different times or not enough communication between teams) is why they don’t mention each other
  2. The royal content is more of an alternate reality continuation of the game

Or has Atlas said other wise about the whole canon

I would really appreciate if someone could help me out thank you in advance

0

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

minev1128 t1_j2dalsw wrote

Honestly whichever works for you. Royale's ending works well too even if there's no mention of Dr. Maruki, since Maruki manipulated reality at that point and Kasumi went overseas to train after the events.

2

memeguy66 OP t1_j2daux4 wrote

Makes sense even when I do play strikers and then Atlas then says it’s not canon due to royal I will still be happy(if I enjoy it)so it probably won’t matter in the future

1