Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Exact3 t1_iw1tl6f wrote

The DT1990 or the HD800(S) feel like cheating at this point when playing competitive FPS-games. So easy to hear exactly where the enemy is.

22

TheMaj0r t1_iw1wolg wrote

Do you guys use the "dolby atmos for headphones" for gaming? Or is such spacial audio program not considered good?

1

[deleted] OP t1_iw1xqh9 wrote

On PC i use FXSound EQ. Toggle the 4.7 khz ranges for Footsteps.

I also bought the PC Dolby Atmos. For the 14 day trial, That is found in settings, sound, headphone, scroll to bottom for Spatial sound.

The surround spatial effect is noticeable.

3

prymortal69 t1_iw1z8x0 wrote

Agreed, The HD560s are actually on point as well even with height & depth, Not as wide as HD800/s so lacks some of the left/right/center advantage you get on top, But its still like cheating with how pin point accurate it is.

My Aryas SE on the other hand, love the sound, but confusing as hell when a sound runs up on you looks up, its down & vise versa!

5

o0Spoonman0o t1_iw20lb1 wrote

Not full sized but I use IEMs for gaming. Was really surprised at just how much better everything sounded as compared to my A50's.

3

No-Context5479 t1_iw23l2i wrote

I don't use headphones for FPS gaming... I use IEMs. Much better suited because the soundstage isn't exaggerated like in the 800S and some other ridiculously soundstaged headphones... Not knocking on your usage... If it works for you more power to you but IEMs are much better for depth perception of how near or far enemies are in FPS games for me

10

sverek t1_iw23rwm wrote

And yet, there is a player on a server with cheap earbuds and owning whole server, because he hears what matters the most.

161

IMKGI t1_iw2fcg2 wrote

If pros use some random IEMs in the world finals and Hyer X headphnoes, some random IEMs or headphones will certainly be good enough for you

32

chucknoel2015 t1_iw2hlpy wrote

i am mainly gaming my hd800s . sometimes it can be confusing. so many things happening. i kinda prefer hd58x which i sold

3

SteakTree t1_iw2hs2y wrote

Spatial audio is essential for creating directional positioning of sounds. Fortunately, many AAA games have a built in dedicated headphones audio option that typically is spatial audio / binaural sound engine.

You don’t need and should not run any additional DSP on top of it. Some games such as Overwatch have licensed Atmos and include it in-game.

Dolby Atmos for headphone is great for movies using multichannel content and works great with Netflix and Prime Video app.

5

QTIIPP t1_iw2i5sl wrote

You do you my friend, but iems drove me nuts! Even some with good staging felt claustrophobic compared to even HD600. I’m sure with time I could get used to it though, and then the large staging would mess me up.

9

vext01 t1_iw2nb69 wrote

Gotta admit, I'm pretty sceptical of all this "headphones give you a competitive advantage" stuff too.

Maybe fractionally. Maybe...

64

Basic-Government4108 t1_iw2o4za wrote

I use high end headphones and an hdmi audio extractor for gaming but it definitely doesn’t help. I suck. But it sounds great!

9

Mamad0u420 t1_iw2okc5 wrote

Why people don't buy dolby atmos to play games on their stereo headphones is beyond me

−1

chubbycanine t1_iw2sbby wrote

I consistently hear people before my squad does with my dt1990s. One uses a razer headset the other uses a fancy steel series. I will still get destroyed by a 10 year old that I got the drop on but that's not the headphones lol

7

owlbgreen357 t1_iw2ugqp wrote

Technically they do. But the advantage you get from them is so far down on the list of what actually matters that its negligible. Gamesense, aim, and map knowlege are far far more important for competitive games

75

ClayH2504 t1_iw2unnv wrote

When I got my LCD-2s one of the first things I did was play the Halo Infinite campaign through them for a bit of a laugh, it was genuinely AMAZING how detailed the soundscape was through those headphones

2

iamrbo t1_iw2uwec wrote

Let me know if you want to sell them lol

1

garagekubrick t1_iw2uydi wrote

Been using my DT 1990s for this game.. The sound design is phenomenal and on my 1990s, the game is absolute ear candy. Gotta switch the audio setting to Cinema though for max dynamic range.

4

Toronto-Will t1_iw2wkvg wrote

I haven’t found MW2 to be particularly good with sound (people materialize behind you without making sound, gadgets and things don’t have sound cues to pick up on), but maybe Warzone is different. I don’t like battle royales.

I use my HD800S in Rainbow Six and adore them. It’s not so much that it makes me “better”, as it makes me happier. I get clear sound information that I can pay attention to and react to, and if I make the wrong choice with that information, it’s my fault. Lesser headphones I spend a lot of time with my face locked into a puzzled frown, “is that— wait no it’s— ☠️”

5

Exact3 t1_iw2xjp8 wrote

Point on, if you play like shit they won't suddenly make you play better, but instead give you the opportunity to be better if you're in a clutch. Not gonna change your rank a whole lot, but helps for sure.

9

ni_lus t1_iw2yhei wrote

Because games already know how to process audio for stereo output. Heck, even mobile BR games know how to position audio. It's not rocket science as you have just 2 ears.

4

nrs207 t1_iw2ywr8 wrote

I’ve been using HD660S lately for MW2. Not the same soundstage obviously, but the imaging is solid enough for this game.

−1

Hex457 t1_iw30dor wrote

Why'd you cheap out?

4

owlbgreen357 t1_iw315fz wrote

Exactly. They just give an already mechanically skilled player slightly more information, it just doesnt really matter unless you are good enough to actually use that information

11

bafrad t1_iw35brp wrote

I don’t think they give a competitive advantage but they are definitely more immersive than all other headphones

4

DravitX5 t1_iw399we wrote

I own these headphones and constantly find myself using my DT1990 pros for every FPS game I play. The sound stage and clarity on these things is insane, but it doesn’t highlight footsteps and movement as well as the 1990s. I have stupid money invested in my sound setup and if you’re doing it for a competitive advantage, you’re better off putting that money into components to push frames OR a better monitor.

20

Titouan_Charles t1_iw39th5 wrote

It's quite a different experience, both have extremely wide soundstage but the IEMs are closed backs and the bass is very immediate, it feels very nice but the upper mids are quite upfront and prone to irritating the ears.

The HD800S is like unlocking 4k but for audio

2

sS1RuXx t1_iw3avnu wrote

Idk if is an advantage, maybe you hear too much details that make you distraction and is an disadvantage.

1

DravitX5 t1_iw3bo88 wrote

I MUCH prefer the comfort of the 1990s to my HD800s, but that’s all personal preference. I’m by no means dogging on the HD800s, they’re the only headphones I’ve ever used that put a smile on my face while listening to music, they’re unbelievable. Just saying that the competitive advantage you’re looking for can be found elsewhere.

10

Tenchiboy t1_iw3dg6p wrote

SteReO hEdPhoNeS will definitely give you an advantge considering humans hear in SrTeReoO.

−1

PsychwardSlippers t1_iw3hiov wrote

I've heard the AKG 700 line can provide a similar experience when gaming with their enormous soundstage.

1

Veil_Of_Mikasa t1_iw3hmyw wrote

I had to stop wearing headphones due to neck issues and I'll honestly never go back after using IEMs. So far I have the fiio fh5, s12, truth ear zero, aria, and dusk. I honestly like using the zero the most for gaming. Feel like it hits foot step audio in the right way in MWII. I was using the dusk and those are good but the eartips coming off drove me up a walk so I'm waiting for some spinfits to come in

2

patrick_j t1_iw3ho6p wrote

100%. Audio fidelity is a very small part of being good at competitive games. Most of the top level players use whatever company sponsors them, and almost none of them use audiophile headphones. The headphones are usually from a company that also makes keyboards. One of the best Apex Legends players (aceu) uses apple earbuds for Christ’s sake.

Unless the game is heavily dependent on a lot of sneaking around and picking up tiny sounds, great headphones will make only the smallest difference.

As long the headphones are halfway decent, the most important factors are comfort and a sound signature that’s not fatiguing. Everything else is just for funzies.

7

MangoAI t1_iw3i1pr wrote

Given how fucked up Warzone audio is you won't be able to make out a difference

1

goattt- t1_iw3k9un wrote

players should use closed cans or monitors for gaming. at least something with isolation. with open backs, all the IMAGING and SOUNDSTAGE is not gonna help if they're struggling to hear footsteps over their GPU fan. if they turn up the volume enough to overcome the ambient noise floor they risk hearing damage over repeated long gaming sessions.

1

llIicit t1_iw3kala wrote

The difference is here is in a tournament setting, everyone is using the same shit, so there isn’t an advantage.

But outside of it you can definitely hear a difference. Not that the 800s is necessary, or even the best (better can be found cheaper).

But that doesn’t matter if you aren’t good enough to capitalize effectively and quickly on those sounds. But if you are good enough to do that then the headphone you use isn’t really as impactful.

This is a hobby though, so using the best will inevitably happen lol

4

Jadejr14 t1_iw3kaoo wrote

Wearing good headphones is perfect for dota helps you rage less 🤣

2

Prestonality t1_iw3l2hc wrote

I found the GSX1000/1200 is the best for audio processing across every game. Personally I do better with cheap IEMs like KZ ZS 10 Pros than anything over the ear.

1

llIicit t1_iw3l63c wrote

MW2’s audio engine is definitely an improvement in my experience. I don’t get the footstep behind me but player is somewhere else phenomenon.

Audio is something you can actually rely on now lol

1

oglocayo t1_iw3r07r wrote

I'm using a Etymotic ER4S to play games, the passive noise isolation is so good and lower bass signature can make me easily pinpoint exactly where the enemy at, especially like footsteps and gun sounds.

3

oglocayo t1_iw3rwio wrote

I prefer iem for one more reason, the HEAT! I admit that I'm a sweaty player, playing with Heavy cushioned/padded Headsets makes me feel nasty and overheating, especially in a humid and hot region.(for instance, im living in hk)

2

Jontun189 t1_iw3s3sr wrote

Good headphones literally changed the game for me on CSGO. On other games? Not so much. Like you said, fractionally... Maybe. Still fucking hate CSGO though.

4

cmickledev t1_iw3t8td wrote

Not playing warzone, and never tried it. But got my first good pair of audiophile headphones with the Fidelio X2hr's, and trying gaming with them in general was an entirely new, and awesome experience. With Tomb Raider and Cyberpunk 2077, super immersive and fun, and the soundstage and imaging is really great and just makes it feel much better to play. My brother has a 5.1 surround sound box setup with a sound bar and I much prefer my X2hr's over that still.

No clue why these surround sound box things with the mini speakers are even popular with consumers.

1

make_moneys t1_iw3u92f wrote

Visual cues are way more important , knowing the map , using the right gear , input/server lag etc etc sound is way down the list but had to spend thousands to realize this. Oh well .. lol

2

KittyFallDown t1_iw3uib1 wrote

I play with hd800s or my Arya's. It doesn't give you an advantage but it sure as fuck FAR more enjoyable to have a comfortable, amazing sounding set of headphones on....

2

FalsettoFlyin t1_iw3uoxw wrote

I haven’t gamed in a while but when I played PC I used some Grados and it made a big difference in hearing footsteps.

1

iGenie t1_iw3uyzg wrote

I got audio 64 u12ts and I still can’t hear shit.

1

elhonna t1_iw3zn79 wrote

When black ops 1 came out, i was playing S&D only, so sound was quite important when you were in 1v2/3 situations and I could hear people running across the map, and even crouching from a quite big distance, as you can imagine, that was a huge advantage.

New cods don’t seem to have as many possible cfg modifications though, and you have too many parasite noises to actually focus on enemies’ footsteps.

1

StableSilent t1_iw41ofd wrote

I don't play warzone but I do wear my ether cx for all my gaming. In games where audio is important I do feel I have an edge. I'm consistently telling my friends where someone is based on audio alone that they can't hear on their gaming headsets.

1

cyciumx t1_iw45igb wrote

Stereo. Headphones. What is this magic? Lol ... Tool.

1

cyciumx t1_iw45vk1 wrote

We don't even know if OP has the capability of critical hearing to genuinely notice. They just think this humble brag is impressive... Lol

3

NoDonut9078 t1_iw4clmn wrote

If Warzone 2 uses the same audio engine as MW2, the sound is tuned poorly; I also use 800’s and 820’s and it doesn’t matter what I do the sound is never accurate, sounds above and below.

Tarkov’s sound engine is so much more precise and maybe it spoiled me.

1

TheOddestOfSocks t1_iw4cqjw wrote

Headphones give an advantage solely because of positioning information that sound can provide. It won't make you hear things earlier, neither will it help you perceive things any better. What I do notice though, I tend to enjoy the soundscape a lot more. Arguably that's a distraction on a competitive game.

1

NoDonut9078 t1_iw4dsru wrote

You are outta your mind, the audio is this game is awful. Maybe Tarkov, Valorant, and CS:Go ruined it for me, but if those three companies could do it why can’t activision?

0

NFS-LeastWanted t1_iw4e3xc wrote

Unrelated, but OP, what's your line of work (employment)?

1

[deleted] OP t1_iw4e6ce wrote

Yep! I hope warzone2 gets better. But notice in Tarkov, its slower game because the enemy knows where you are at. And you know them so it becomes a standoff.

Less arcade.

1

BananaCarnage t1_iw4ejrr wrote

Yup those are them. I am running them off the wa-22 with heavily upgraded tubes they are a beast to run. I like them better with a solid state amp though. Wa-22 is perfect for the 800s for me.

2

DeangeloV t1_iw4i34y wrote

Sweet headphones! It’s always nice to be able to hear the enemy before they hear you! Hopefully your sticking to the solo tho lol. From one fellow gamer to another, having a teammate without a mic to communicate puts a 4 man squad at quite the disadvantage and stinks. I make due with my Astro A50s!

1

Latingamer24 t1_iw4igup wrote

Finally someone who says the truth. Ma dude only wanted to flex his headphones, competitive advantages are better left for good monitors, graphics , keyboard and mouse. Pros play with garbage headsets and they still own anyone that is in front of them.

5

haziq110 t1_iw4n1u3 wrote

I play CS and some rhythm games with my IEMs and tbh, CS 3D positional audio is already good enough on any decent earbuds. The higher fidelity does not give me more immersion in rhythm games either because of how fast paced the gameplay is. I’m sure the immersion factor plays more in single player rpg games etc though, especially with game soundtracks.

1

AnDropeZ t1_iw4o10p wrote

I really want these headphones! I'm currently running the hifiman HE400se with an ifi air zen. A pretty good setup for $200.

1

DeathbyBambii t1_iw4oew5 wrote

I recently bought LCD-GX but I keep going back to the Mobius because footsteps are much louder under 7.1 surround sound mode. Guess I’ll just use the GX for non competitive gaming because they still sound heckin amazing!

1

biezwax t1_iw4qqo4 wrote

Here I am with my Hd560S and Zen Dac V2.

1

So_Say_We_Yall t1_iw4v86m wrote

They absolutely give an advantage, significant even. Now, whether or not a player has the overall game knowledge/awareness/mechanical ability to use the advantage is another story.

Whether or not it's "real" or not isn't debatable.

Edit: others have said basically the same thing as I have. Sorry.

1

baconfister07 t1_iw54q4o wrote

I can't do much with that information, I'm deaf on one side, and it only sucks when I hear footsteps, but can't tell where they're coming from because I have to play with mono settings. I wish there were ways to cater L/R volume, like to give my deaf side a bass boost, because I can feel it if it's loud enough, but then it'll just be too loud for my good side. I don't win all the time, but my K/D is usually pretty good by the end.

3

Yacatect t1_iw56m0d wrote

If I had this setup I'd go with an XLR cable.

Not because it's better or anything, just because it's way more satisfying to plug in and out.

2

TechieWeird t1_iw5aru6 wrote

You know a 50-100$ gaming headset will give you the same "advantage" right? And "hearing before others can hear you" is just you turning your volume up. Most games use basic stereo, with some using "virtual 7.1 surround" (basically just spacial sound) if your headset supports it. This stuff is for music and audio production man why you do this

1

MiCon29 t1_iw5en7p wrote

I stopped using more tha 2 channels a long time ago. Yiu can still hear well enough

1

digsavior t1_iw5lkje wrote

I'm trying to decide between those. I listen to jam bands and electronic music so the extra bass from the Arya would be kind of nice but the sound stage and clarity of the 800s would be nice for the jam bands. Please help me make up my mind!

1

KittyFallDown t1_iw5q07s wrote

You absolutely can't go wrong. Both are outstanding. I was a full 800s guy until I got the Arya's (I also have the Anandas) and Id say the hifiman are more comfortable. I won't get into SQ since it's such a personal preference.

If I had to sell one with a gun to my head, I'd probably sell the hd800s and honestly, only becuase the the Arya are more comfortable.

2

day_oh t1_iw5qrd9 wrote

I also game with the 800s and I don't think I am any better at any game. Instead, sound quality is certainly more astounding it's hard to go back to anything else outside of a good speaker system.

3

chloe334 t1_iw5vdea wrote

In my opinion, your hd800s would give no advantage over some cheap hyper x cloud 2s or something. Its totally fine to like using nice headphones for games but i dont think it gives any sort of advantage. "I can hear other players before they hear me" and so can timmy with his earbuds on 100% volume.

1

Halo909 t1_iw60igk wrote

I find for video games the hd800s are too artificially wide

1

sverek t1_iw60uv4 wrote

Headphones do not give you any significant advantage, the volume do.

More detailed headphones like DT1990, will present more details in sound, but it does change the fact that there was a foot step somewhere around you. In my opinion, DT1990 does the opposite of helping. There amount of details I hear, does not help, but distract me from gaming. I do not want to hear how crispy or or how mistakes there are in the footstep sound. I just want to hear it.

2

General_fcf t1_iw6kvon wrote

Cool i plan to buy those soon. What made you go with that specific DAC?

1

TwitchyG13 t1_iw7ksz5 wrote

Headphones at most give some postionality advantage but I've never felt it was super game changing unless I accidently have my headphones backwards lol. I do run my He-4xx most times but if there's too much noise in my house I use my pair of sivgas.

1

shadow18715 t1_iw7wvsy wrote

If you think a pair of $1500 headphones will make you hear everyone before they hear you, I've got some swampland in Florida to sell you.

1

PutPineappleOnPizza t1_iw89vpy wrote

Gear can only do so much. Many people really think that their gear can make them better but in the end it's just their shortcomings holding them back. Like who cares about lightning fast keyboards when your reaction time is the slowest part in the chain? Who cares about the perfect headphone when cheap ones do the same things in terms of hearing the enemy?

The whole gaming equipment marketing is more snake oil than stuff on this sub sometimes.

1

BarNathrakh t1_iwa30j1 wrote

I'll own a pair of these some day but I just can't fork out the money for these yet. I really love my tygr 300r, and dt 990 250 ohms for gaming, I modified those and my dt 770s to have a detachable cable port 3.5mm and able to use them in conjunction with a v moda boom pro. Easily the best mod I could have done on those and it elavates them to whole new level gaming.

1

cmickledev t1_iwa7329 wrote

You can use peace UI + equalizer APO and there's a ton of different DSP you can get and use for free utilizing HeSuVi, it's what I use, works very well, and you get to keep and use your eq settings as well.

1

Injoemomma t1_iy0265t wrote

I just ordered a pair of HD 800s for CS-GO. I wish people would just comment and help instead of talking shit. I would really like to know what AMP you recommend and DAC if I have to get one. Don’t care to listen to music. Just want simple use for CS-GO. Which is why I’m thinking bulb might not be for me. I’m not tech savvy. I’m thinking the element 3 but I have no idea if I have to get DAC. Let me know what you end up going with.

1

Injoemomma t1_iy2btsl wrote

Please help. Just ordered a HD800 s solely for CS-GO. What amp/DAC combo do you have and what do you recommend for me? I’m assuming I do not need anything crazy since I’m just using it for CS-GO. I want something easy to use since I’m not tech savvy and don’t have have patience to mess with electronics.

1

Injoemomma t1_iy2bwt6 wrote

Please help. Just ordered a HD800 s solely for CS-GO. What amp/DAC combo do you have and what do you recommend for me? I’m assuming I do not need anything crazy since I’m just using it for CS-GO. I want something easy to use since I’m not tech savvy and don’t have have patience to mess with electronics.

1

Injoemomma t1_iy2c841 wrote

And you just wanted to hate. What if you already have the best cpu, gpu, and monitor? And you just need the best headphones for gaming? What’s wrong with that? I have a 7k pc setup and just bought the latest 360hz BenQ monitor that is the best for Csgo right now. I ordered a pair of hd800s yesterday just for Csgo. What’s wrong with getting the best? I don’t understand haters like you.

−1

Exact3 t1_iy2dtp9 wrote

I use an RME ADI-2 DAC but if I didn't, I'd probably just go with something like a Topping-stack. Just love fiddling with the RME's settings, doubt they sound different.

1

day_oh t1_iy2vlmy wrote

I have a simple set up using Schitt Hel (ver 1 and not 2e) as my dac/amp connected to the controller! You can use the usb to connect straight to the consoles but you lose access to mic functionality. Also i find the spatial audio feature from both the PS5 and Series X work better through the controller.

My set up goes as follows: Controller -> In-line cable -> Schitt Hel dac/amp -> HD800s

You can find a lavalier mic and connect to the Schitt Hel mic out which has volume control!

Hope this helps and congrats on your new HD800s!

2

Toronto-Will t1_iy2znyz wrote

I don’t think it matters. You’ll get the benefits of the headphone no matter what you plug it into. Find something with nice knobs and switches that you like looking at on your desk.

2

Injoemomma t1_iy4e32u wrote

Thanks! You think the version 2e is better? It’s very affordable. I will use it on pc. You think it’s enough to power the hd800s when using it on pc for counterstrike? Is that a DAC and amp combo? Sorry. I’m a noob to all this. Lol. Thanks! I’m excited! How do you like the comfort? I can’t have something clamping on my head. That’s why I bought them. They haven’t arrived yet.

1

Toronto-Will t1_iy4qtal wrote

They require a lot of power relative to something like an IEM that's hyper-sensitive, but like, I can run it off my iPhone with the Apple Dongle and it's comfortably loud at ~85% of max volume.

A bit more headroom than that is optimal, you can get issues with uneven frequency response when you're near an amp's max volume (bass is relatively power thirsty, as I understand it, and there are transient peaks in music that need more power), but especially for something like gaming, I think you'd honestly be *fine* with just an apple dongle (the US version, the EU version is less powerful).

Call me a hypocrite because I'm running a Monolith DAC/amp with bleeding edge specs and enough wattage to power a small country, but I'd actually prefer to be using a GoXLR Mini for gaming; I only put my GoXLR away because the audio kept dropping out, and despite trying 15 different things I couldn't fix it.

If I had it to do over, I'd never buy the GoXLR or the Monolith, and would instead get a Motu M2. I have it on my Amazon wish list even now, but it'd be pointless because of all the money I've sunk into other things. A combo mic amp and headphone dac/amp would be one less thing cluttering my desk, and offers the convenience of zero latency mic monitoring as part of the mix.

2

Injoemomma t1_iy4uobw wrote

Wow!!!! Thank you so much! You explain it well so I can understand. I really appreciate your time. That’s another concern of mine, latency. I don’t want to add al this stuff and have extra latency. So the one you mentioned would have less latency? I’ll look it up right now.

1

Toronto-Will t1_iy55lal wrote

I was talking about low latency *mic* monitoring (like, hearing yourself speak into the microphone back into your headphones), since any latency with that, even a few milliseconds, can be noticeable and disorienting.

I've never really looked into latency going to the headphone from the computer. It's absolutely an issue with bluetooth, if you've ever tried watching TV/movies over a bluetooth headset the lip sync being off is noticeable, but it's never been something that I've perceived as an issue with wired headphones.

Doing some searching, it seems like ASIO drivers give you the ability to minimize latency, and there's something called ASIO4all that works universally, if your dac manufacturer doesn't have their own native ASIO driver. But going ASIO would bypass my equalizer, and I need the equalizer to tamp down treble that would otherwise hurt my ears. I found an audio latency test on Youtube, and even in my setup that's not optimized for the lowest possible sound latency, it is still perfectly synced with the video. Remember there is latency in the video rendering, too, so you almost want some lag in the audio rendering to keep them in sync.

1

ViniRustAlves t1_iy6gkxh wrote

I don't think he's hating at anyone, he's just stating that the OP wanted an excuse to flex on his HD800, which could be true or not. Being an audiophile subreddit, it's more on the true side, I mean, it's not like OP is wrong in flexing on a superb pair of headphones, I'd do that too, but headphones doesn't really give even the most high skilled players an advantage, or even an edge, but it's good AF to have a good pair of headphones/IEMs for gaming.

2

Injoemomma t1_iy6hzxd wrote

He is most def hating. I call it what it is. Trust me. So what if he just wants to talk to others that enjoy high quality shit? I literally daily a Trackhawk which cost me 107k out the door. I like to chop it up with others that drive similar cars. I like people doing well and getting what they want in life. This clown is a grade A hater.

0

ViniRustAlves t1_iy74pz4 wrote

You might be right about him, but still, trying to gate on people flexing in a subreddit where you're very welcome to do that is really dumb. We're here to flex on our nice audio stuff, be it expensive or cheap.

Yet, he ain't wrong, imo, about the headphones for gaming part. Of course, I pretty much assume OP already have a high-end setup, with a 4090 or something.

1

Injoemomma t1_iy75pnk wrote

So what if you already have the best monitor, gpu, cpu, keyboard, and mouse? And the only thing left is the end all be all headphones for gaming? Huh? Exactly. Nobody is saying good gear, is going to make you pro. At the end of the day, good gear is an advantage. If you up against someone with similar skill and you have better headphones, you will have an advantage. By definition of course. I game on the latest 360hz monitor. Will I beat a pro on a 144hz? No. Will I have an advantage over a similar skilled player with a 144 or 240hz? Yes, I will. Just like oP, I didn’t skim out on Anything. So why buy garbage earbuds or headphones for gaming? He is a hater. Haters gonna hate. It’s what they do best.

1

ViniRustAlves t1_iy8x5yy wrote

>If you up against someone with similar skill and you have better headphones, you will have an advantage.

Only if you're up against people with poor game sense, aim and stuff.

I'm not saying that upgrading headphones shouldn't be done or anything, I'm just saying that high-end headphones, especifically, don't portray any advantage whatsoever while gaming. It's just how it is.

And even in some games, like APEX, you're actually better with some apple earpods and using audio compression than with god tier DT 1990's or something.

The same applies to keyboard, it just needs to be NKRO and not have any double-click problem and you're fine, it's not a precision peripheral, like a mouse or monitor.

​

>Will I have an advantage over a similar skilled player with a 144 or 240hz? Yes, I will.

As I've said, it's not comparable. It's like saying that you got and advantage over the other same skill level player because you were with your foot on a support.

Most game audios are crap, the difference a headphone will make can only go so far, and it's not far at all in current competitive games audio engines.

Again, I'm not saying it's a bad thing to upgrade you audio for competitive game, it might be though, I'm just saying it won't give you any advantage.

1

ViniRustAlves t1_iy94fip wrote

>Again Since you are slow

Now you're hating on me just because I disagree with you.

Again, unless the "similar skilled" players are two dumb silver/gold/plat skilled players, that don't have any game sense, you might get an advantage, and even so, only if the game have a good audio engine, like R6S, not in games like Valorant, APEX and most other competitive games, where audio engine is just pure garbage, where having an HD800S might distract you instead of help, because instead of just hearing the fucking footsteps, you're hearing a lot more, useless, distratcting information.

And I'll not discuss it anymore, I feel like you won't get my point, and I'll not get yours either.

0

ViniRustAlves t1_iy9lf95 wrote

>You argue like a female.

Oh, nice a mysoginist, probably incel judging by that comment, now that makes sense.

​

>By definition, having a headset that allows you to hear footsteps better than someone with inferior headphones, does give you an advantage.

How hard can it be to understand that if you play a game, and you have a bare minimum ammount of awareness and developed game sense, a better headphone won't give you any advantage against another player at that same level of awareness and game sense development, aim, etc., etc.

You need to hear he's moving, you'll know the locations he might come after you.

And advantage is a better ping (or worst, in games like Valorant and Overwatch), less input delay, better game sense, high refresh rate with low pixel transition times, stable frame rates for consistent delay. That's an advantage in competitive games.

1

day_oh t1_iy9mmp7 wrote

You think the version 2e is better?--id stay away from these based on online reviews i've read.

I also occasionally use a SoundblastX G6 which is a slightly cheaper alternative but i find the sound it produces can often sound a little "processed"

Actually, your pc soundcard might be more than sufficient to power the 800s.

You think it’s enough to power the hd800s when using it on pc for counterstrike? -- the 800s are actually pretty easy to power so yes.

Is that a DAC and amp combo? -- yes. Schitt Hel is a dac/amp combo.

1

headphones-ModTeam t1_iy9xlpo wrote

This comment has been removed. Please note the following rule:

>Rule 1: Be most excellent towards your fellow redditors > > And by "be most excellent" we mean no personal attacks, threats, bullying, trolling, baiting, flaming, hate speech, racism, sexism, or other behavior that makes humanity look like scum.

But they're wrong!

Disagreeing with someone is fine, being toxic is not.

Don't impede reasonable discussion or vilify based on what you or the other person believes or knows to be true.

Look at what they said!

Responding to a person breaking Rule 1 does not grant a pass to break the same rule. Everyone is responsible for their own participation on r/headphones.

Violations may result in a temporary or permanent ban.

1

ViniRustAlves t1_iyctvzb wrote

> If you have all that already, why not top it off with a high end headphone?

You should do that, if that's what you want, will not give you an advantage in a decent balanced scenario though, the other guy with his apple earbuds or even worse, KZ Zest's, will be in the same page as you, maybe will be even in a better spot, judging by CS audio engine.

> I have a 7k pc, the latest Ben q 360hz monitor that is the absolute best for counterstrike, the best internet in my location, the best mouse… Again little girl brain: Two similar skilled players, exactly the same, exact equipment, other than headphones of course. The one with the better headphones for footsteps will have an advantage.

Answered above.

Good thing Relay let me read deleted comments, if not I'd never new I was talking to the Alpha ruler of them all.

Your necessity to backup your answers by stating you're a superior male made me laugh.

1