Comments
Protean_Protein t1_iuaz94n wrote
I poured him a Limoncello he couldn’t refuse. (Because otherwise all his old scars would reopen and he’d bleed out and die.)
Cassandra- t1_iub17df wrote
Huh? Italian mafia is 300 years old, Sicilian mafia is younger. Corsican mafia is 400 years old.
agreea OP t1_iub2sx6 wrote
Early mafia history is so weird and surprising relative to what we understand of the modern mafia.
For example, here's how mobsters in Sicily in 1875 introduced themselves to each other as "made" men (aka formally inducted to the mafia):
A: God's blood! My tooth hurts! (pointing to one of the upper canines)
B: Mine too
A: When did yours hurt?
B: On the day of our Lady of the Annunciation.
A: Where were you?
B: Passo di Ragano
A: And who was there?
B: Nice people.
A: Who were they?
B: Antonino Giammona, number 1. Alfonso Spatola, number 2, etc.
A: How did they do the bad deed?
B: They drew lots and Alfonso Spatola won. He took a saint, colored it with my blood, put in the palm of my hand, and burned it. He threw the ashes in the air.
A: Who did they tell you to adore.
B: The sun and the moon.
A: And who is your god?
B: An 'Air'.
A: What kingdom do you belong to?
B: The index finger.
-
Compare that to mafiosos in the US today:
A: "[B] is a friend of ours"
​
Edit: Source: John Dickie, Cosa Nostra, p. 46-47
Commubot t1_iub53e0 wrote
>You can probably extrapolate this more generally, that organized criminal groups form around certain industries that the state cannot or will not protect
This exactly. Happens with any industry lacking proper regulation. People love to hate in "big government" and the central authorities without thinking about who/what would step in to take their place if they ceased to exist.
TomorrowWeKillToday t1_iub6t8s wrote
Yeah, I’d take this with a grain of salt…..then tequila
Sometimes_Stutters t1_iub6ykg wrote
Fun fact- Sauerkraut was actually the primary food to prevent scurvy. Cheaper, easier to transport, and lasted much longer.
re_nonsequiturs t1_iub83n9 wrote
In your first example, A did not know B, but in your second, A knows B. The first is clearly a series of passwords to test an unknown claimant.
How would the introduction go today if A didn't know B?
In 1875, how would B have been introduced to C if A knew B?
agreea OP t1_iub93eu wrote
Very good point, the comparison isn’t 1:1. As I understand it (not at all a mobster myself just a voracious consumer of mob content), today A would say to B “I’m with Z’s family/crew” if they were from the same area, and might specify the location if they weren’t from the same area. But generally they wouldn’t talk Cosa Nostra stuff if they were strangers, even if they were both in the mob. There would need to be an intro made between them.
In 1875, B would likely have introduced themselves to C using the same ritual above, but perhaps with A hinting to C to kick it off by… complaining about a toothache to B lmao.
[deleted] t1_iubb5pt wrote
[removed]
quelar t1_iubbrty wrote
If you need training wheels that's ok, just don't embarrass your friends by saying it's better that way.
Princess_Juggs t1_iubbxpa wrote
Well there wouldn't be so many sailors going on long voyages and getting scurvy if that pesky Cristóbal Colón hadn't gotten Europe hooked on colonizing the New World!
[deleted] t1_iubh9nd wrote
[removed]
TomorrowWeKillToday t1_iubhqrn wrote
You realise wordplay is just for fun right?
[deleted] t1_iubhxxd wrote
[removed]
JohnnySnarkle t1_iubnseb wrote
Yeah seems right I mean that’s how the American mafias got there boom in the early 1900s till around the early 90s or late 80s (I’m sorta just throwing those dates around cause that’s where I see where the Mafia really dropped off in how powerful they were) when the Government started protecting the Stock Market and things such as way more than they did prior. I know organized crime got their bread and butter doing other things but how they manipulated the stock market to make millions is insane to me.
KittyScholar t1_iubo4kx wrote
Hmm. I’ve been thinking about a 7th Seas campaign (a table top game about magic pirates). This might be fun to have in it.
[deleted] t1_iubp1d7 wrote
[removed]
scurvy4all t1_iubr8ng wrote
I was one of the only people that knew this already.
AlfaBetaZulu t1_iubrj19 wrote
I remember years back 60 minutes did a little segment on truffles. The guy they were interviewing was claiming the mafia and mob were all in on the truffle business. I forget the question but at one point he dragged his thumb across his neck like if he answered wrong they would kill him. It was a weird segment. Lol. Idk this just made me think of it.
Manaoscola t1_iubsdg4 wrote
The problem is when the central goverment becomes the mafia itselve
tonipaz t1_iubsvr0 wrote
No the problem is when central government decides prosecuting crime is more profitable than taxing the transactions that are considered “criminal”
I.e. the war on drugs (still going on)
Manaoscola t1_iubtgvw wrote
not every part of the world has the same issues as USA, some places the central goverment becomes an actual mafia and feeds from industries, sometimes even destroying them.
[deleted] t1_iubtudh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iubu26o wrote
[removed]
TurboGuyUndercover t1_iubu2sy wrote
You’re avoiding the point made in the comment
[deleted] t1_iubukmw wrote
Jrook t1_iubvwh9 wrote
Such as?
Niko_The_Fallen t1_iubw60m wrote
In the whole world?
Manaoscola t1_iubwba6 wrote
Argentina, Saudi Arabia, China, and many african nations.
Commubot t1_iubxdz8 wrote
Cartel of the Sun anyone ?
Manaoscola t1_iubxugk wrote
venezuela is just sad...
Jrook t1_iubz1wf wrote
What industries did they destroy by Mafia tactics?
[deleted] t1_iuc1p7b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuc3cgr wrote
[removed]
KingHenry13th t1_iuc4l18 wrote
Another fun fact- during ww2 the Americans called the germans krauts because they always found sourkraut left behind in their camps. The Americans called brits limeys because they used limes for scurvey prevention.
Staerebu t1_iuc6pu3 wrote
Polynesians stored pandan paste and fermented breadfruit while they were settling the Pacific
OuterOne t1_iuc9akk wrote
Send to me like Saudi and Chinese industries are going pretty well.
godofwine16 t1_iucala2 wrote
What about the poverty of the mezzogiorno?
Luckyjonas t1_iucaocf wrote
This was my first thought… wonder if all the oranges / lemons references, especially in death scenes, trace back to this. Pretty cool if so
[deleted] t1_iucbtq5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuccs00 wrote
[removed]
PrettyText t1_iuccugv wrote
Yeah, good point. Power abhors a vacuum. Saying "let's have no government and magically everyone will somehow respect property rights" is simply naive.
PrettyText t1_iucdcqg wrote
While not being specifically about lemons, this is a great watch about the Mafia: The Fascinating Economics of Crime | Thomas Sowell
Kukuxupunku t1_iucfd9s wrote
So what did the Americans use themselves?
TheEyeDontLie t1_iucffbw wrote
The Americans didn't get a nickname cos they arrived late.
VoodooMagic13X t1_iucfjhy wrote
A B C, It's easy as 1 2 3, as simple as Do re mi, A B C, 1 2 3 Baby you and me girl
TheEyeDontLie t1_iucfp5i wrote
Consensual wordplay is adults only and they let children on reddit now. I've seen like 21 year old on here!
OneEightActual t1_iucfsts wrote
Funner fact: the British were dismayed to find out that limes don't actually prevent scurvy; although they taste sour because of citirc acid, they don't actually contain a lot of Vitamin C. It turns out there was some confusion about the translations for words like limón that might might mean limes, lemons or even both. What we know as limes were just easier to come by in a lot of British colonies, so that's what they used, with inconsistent and sometimes disappointing results.
Even funner still fact: scurvy was widespread in winter months in Europe before potatoes were cultivated from the New World in the 17th Century. Potatoes gained popularity because they grew easily on land that might otherwise be unusable for farming, and potatoes could be stored for months with little effort. Through an accident that wasn't understood until the 20th Century, it turned out that potatoes contained just enough Vitamin C to help stave off the worst of scurvy. At about the same time limes were adopted, potatoes became more common for provisioning ships too, and the reduction in scurvy was misattributed to limes.
Edit: forgot supporting link about Vitamin C in potatoes, sry
[deleted] t1_iucg6vx wrote
[removed]
sojywojum t1_iucgwve wrote
how were the americans preventing scurvy?
AngerCookShare t1_iucicc9 wrote
Sloofin t1_iuciujy wrote
The septics definitely had nicknames despite arriving late.
Thebitterestballen t1_iucivv8 wrote
Also many spices, such as chilli or star anise, contain huge amounts of vitamin C. There where ships that lost most of their crew to scurvy while bringing spices from the east, without knowing their ship was stuffed with the cure.
[deleted] t1_iucjbpr wrote
[removed]
KombuchaBot t1_iucjk74 wrote
Methods of conflict resolution from the old country, yeah
[deleted] t1_iucjl7z wrote
[removed]
Infamous-Salad-2223 t1_iuckmpo wrote
Yep, if the state is absent, someone else will intervene.
toastythemoasty t1_iuckt2h wrote
There was no abundance of intention in packing the suitcase!
godofwine16 t1_iucmw6w wrote
hottest day of the year
Meadow-I made you some chili!
typhoonbrew t1_iucngoy wrote
I just listened to a podcast with Tim Hartford where a lot of this was discussed: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/cautionary-tales-with-tim-harford/id1484511465?i=1000557643019
PicardTangoAlpha t1_iucnjrc wrote
For those wondering, oranges in this film were harbingers of death.
Iwantmyflag t1_iuco7qi wrote
None of this is true.
Limes contain a lot of vitamin C.
Various cabbages were a widespread winter food in Europe and contain plenty vitamin C.
Isthecoldwarover t1_iucopa7 wrote
I thought the same on your first point since spuds contain less vitamin c than limes but assume the quantity of each ration was actually improtant, so it was the daily handful of spuds rather than whatever their lime ration was that made the difference
Don't get your second point since cabbages wouldn't last the full lenght of a journey in comparison to spuds which have a much longer shelf life
OneEightActual t1_iucpygv wrote
Still funner fact: Albert Szent-Györgyi was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1937 for (among other things) discovering Vtiamin C in paprika. This was basically the point at which it finally started to become understood.
schizboi t1_iucr1zr wrote
Cabbages are in kraut I think
flourishingvoid t1_iucrir2 wrote
I know what they mean by "Lemons cure scurvy" but
Still have to elaborate, scurvy is a condition in which a human lacks vitamin C intake or just a Vitamin C deficit... Lemons are just a good source of Vitamin C, but there are many other fruits and vegetables with high amounts of Vitamin C, Lemons have this reputation due to their relative ease of storage, and the fact it's mainly has been consumed raw or added late to the food in cooking thus, maintaining high concentrations of Vitamin C.
Tomatoes also have a decent amount of Vitamin C, but people cook them and neutralise a lot of the Vitamins in them ( kinda )
gimnasium_mankind t1_iucrqhu wrote
After many years of reduced growth compared to the rest of the world, one could say that an industry « has been destroyed ». The reduced growth can come from excessive taxes and regulations, permits, licenses, any kind of mandatory contribution. Contributions that don’t « come back » propotionally in services or in infrastructure.
OneEightActual t1_iucrwzr wrote
That's the thing; potatoes were given daily or even several times daily when they were available, which got really common. Limes/lime juice were rationed more carefully. I can't find the reference now, but there was even a British expedition to the Antarctic relying on limes that got stricken with scurvy, and it could not be explained why at the time.
Fermented cabbage products like sauerkraut were trialed and were successful, but weren't widely adopted, perhaps because of the Brits' tendency to cook it in iron cookware that gave it an unpleasant metallic taste.
Lone-Sloth t1_iucwf4l wrote
Because its assuming that only US problems matter while other countries are having a lot bigger problems than the war on drugs, like "oh no you can't do drugs legally" meanwhile in China there's currently an ongoing genocide or other countries where the government is tyrannical
scotch-o t1_iucy2a8 wrote
Grew up having canned orange juice all the time! Loved when my grandma made it as she would rinse out the can it came in and let me use it as my drinking cup.
[deleted] t1_iuczj2w wrote
[removed]
congradulations t1_iuczk66 wrote
Still people manipulating the stock market, but they're no longer called criminals
mauganra_it t1_iud08dw wrote
Organized crime is not despised by for manipulating the stock market.
[deleted] t1_iud1te8 wrote
[removed]
HelmutHoffman t1_iud5pje wrote
That doesn't mean a massive bloated corrupt bureaucratic system is good either. Most people who want to do away with bloat still want there to be government. Most people who want true anarchy are still too young to even be out of school yet.
[deleted] t1_iud5rvu wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iud5zjp wrote
[removed]
Jdomtattooer t1_iud9dvb wrote
Happens with my profession, tattooing, and always has had, though.
[deleted] t1_iudak77 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iudaxrf wrote
[removed]
Lindvaettr t1_iudbfda wrote
Or when they care more about public perception than competence. Most people opposed to big government aren't against the concept of regulation. They're against poor regulation that doesn't achieve what it's supposed to and overburdens the people it's supposed to protect.
[deleted] t1_iudcu0i wrote
[removed]
Redboy45672 t1_iudeele wrote
Another reason why anarcho capitalism is a dumb ideology
ends_abruptl t1_iudgkzz wrote
Yeah, not to mention you need less than a tenth of a gram of vitamin C a day. It's ludicrously easy to get enough. So easy in fact, the human body never evolved a vitamin C storage system.
[deleted] t1_iudjhvo wrote
[removed]
fjvgamer t1_iudkqvx wrote
It makes sense though I don't know enough of the history to judge .
A commodity comes expensive and rare its going to create a blackmarket.
brownpaperboi t1_iudlctf wrote
I think the above comment is talking about the resource curse, where governments essentially focused on supporting and taxing one industry to the detriment of other industries. Countries with resource curse historically have high levels of corruption and frequently poor government services since the main goal of government is rent collection. Example include Nigeria, Mexico 20 years ago, Angola, Iraq and some other nations.
dg4vdo t1_iudm8ev wrote
My dog abhors vacuums too.
ColonelKasteen t1_iudnlks wrote
No, "limey" was in use for English sailors and more generally for English men everywhere in the anglosphere since the 19th century.
WWII GIs sometimes referred to English troops as limeys because they had been called that for the last 100 years. They more often called English troops Tommys.
[deleted] t1_iudnll6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iudnvqh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iudo18b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iudqgnk wrote
[removed]
Theban_Prince t1_iudrgn0 wrote
Actually if you read the research OP posted there are parallels drawn between sudden windfall of wealth due to natural resources with the existence of both mafia and corrupted goverments.
The issue seems to be not about "goverment" by definition, but the fact that the influx of wealth in an already weakend state will spawn mafiesque organisations, either in the form of full blown criminal organistions and/or corrupted states
[deleted] t1_iudtww1 wrote
[removed]
the_barroom_hero t1_iudzsey wrote
If you think the problem with the war on drugs is "oh no you can't do drugs legally" you need to learn about the war on drugs
Sun_Devilish t1_iue0icb wrote
False dilemma. The choice is not between big government regulation on one hand, and criminal empires on the other. There are many points in between these two extremes.
tlst9999 t1_iue0w17 wrote
Not to the ones who will be the winners of anarcho capitalism.
Redboy45672 t1_iue1gac wrote
I suppose you could say that about any organization of society lol
knochback t1_iue37hk wrote
It's less about "oh no I can't do drugs" and more about "oh no, these antiquated drug laws are used to unfairly target minorities and poor people, ruining lives while not fixing literally any problem"
Frosty-Wave-3807 t1_iue5rgn wrote
Sauerkraut can easily survive 6+ months. I've eaten older preparations, both that I've made and commercially prepared, for longer than that, 10+ months. It took anywhere from ~8-12 weeks to sail across the Atlantic. Think the sauerkraut would be fine.
[deleted] t1_iue6n4y wrote
[removed]
florinandrei t1_iue6tt7 wrote
Yeah, the mafia state is bad. Except for the mafiosi.
[deleted] t1_iue6wad wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iue70ck wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iue72tx wrote
[removed]
Commubot t1_iue94px wrote
Not saying it's 100% criminal organizations that would take over, just that whatever takes the place of the government more than likely wouldn't have the average person's well-being in mind.
BurningHuman t1_iuea56j wrote
I despise them for manipulating the McDonald’s monopoly game
[deleted] t1_iueddwt wrote
[removed]
_kroy t1_iuede29 wrote
> Tomatoes also have a decent amount of Vitamin C, but people cook them and neutralise a lot of the Vitamins in them ( kinda )
And during this time, thought to be poisonous.
flourishingvoid t1_iuee7qj wrote
Ok and?
It was considered poisonous in Europe broadly... In Italy specifically around the late 17th century and maybe early 18th century.
How does that in any way reduce my point?
[deleted] t1_iueea8y wrote
[removed]
_kroy t1_iuef7in wrote
I mean, just in that old habits die hard and tomatoes, which are difficult to store, transport, doesn’t keep fresh long, vitamin C gets destroyed easily, means specifically they probably weren’t looking towards this as a scurvy cure
flourishingvoid t1_iueg7g5 wrote
Yeah, but it was a side example, some other fruits and vegetables could have been used... Bell pepper and cabbage are good examples
[deleted] t1_iuegdf5 wrote
[removed]
_kroy t1_iuegm07 wrote
Sure. And that was the point, which you somehow took extremely defensively.
In a conversation about scurvy and vitamin C, tomatoes are a less-than-ideal example, especially when you point out that the vitamin c is destroyed
flourishingvoid t1_iuegumm wrote
Yeah, but that was the whole point... I compared the worst to the best stressing why Tomatoes weren't used with complimentary justifications about cooking.
[deleted] t1_iuegyfq wrote
[removed]
OttoVonAuto t1_iuekgle wrote
I’ve heard of a similar tale about the Sicilian garbage pickers who, also lacking government support and protection, worked with the Mafia which also started the whole mafia and garbage collection issue
Sun_Devilish t1_iuel37u wrote
The government doesn't have the average person's well being in mind either.
Government bureaucrats (and especially politicians) only care about their own power and position....just like everyone else.
Putting too much power into the hands of any single group, or single individual, is a certain recipe for tyranny. There is no perfect solution, and anyone who claims to have one is just angling to increase their own power and position.
The best we can hope for is a society in which various factions and groups are engaged in a Mexican standoff, and no one is too big for their britches.
agreea OP t1_iuemip2 wrote
Yeah I’ve heard of waste management as a common industry for mafias to control. I think it’s because it’s so territorial and there’s really only room for one vendor in a given area (who goes shopping for their trash guy?), so being able to use force to crowd out competition determines whether you’ll capture market share.
I’ve also seen firsthand some of these dynamics in informal settlements in Kenya where the government can’t provide waste management due to lack of infrastructure. Though in that case it’s usually more “youth groups/gangs” fighting over garbage collection turf than organized criminal enterprises.
Bokth t1_iuepi0y wrote
Oh you mean the reason we shut down imports of avocados from Mexico (briefly)
littlesymphonicdispl t1_iuertg1 wrote
And they added onto it. That's all. That's it. Chill.
BoopsScroopin t1_iuevdae wrote
Everything will always suck for almost everyone almost all the time relative to the experience of the ruling class, it's just a question of to what degree. A system (or lack thereof) like anarcho capitalism just sets a very, very, very, exceptionally low floor for the everyman's quality of life.
Redboy45672 t1_iuexcuo wrote
Correct. Dialectical materialism is a good theory imo
jumpupugly t1_iuffo9e wrote
Anarchistic governance would be less about "do whatever you want", and more "dismantle hierarchies that let those on top do whatever they want."
So, if there's a bunch of folks who need protection and are banding together to do so, supplies, support and training should be directed towards them, and means by which the community can participate in and regulate the self defense force established.
[deleted] t1_iufgojh wrote
[removed]
Armigine t1_iufrhey wrote
While still keeping in mind that, functionally, most people who go on about anything close to "big government" are actually arguing against safety nets and accountability
SkinHairNails t1_iufxjgo wrote
What country are you in?
[deleted] t1_iug0gsg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iug1btm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iug2d3n wrote
[removed]
deryq t1_iug92sw wrote
Here’s a thought: stop voting for people that don’t have your interests in mind. Example: the Republican parties only aim is to eliminate taxes and destroy the federal and state governments. That’s not in your interests unless you’re a billionaire or a corporation. Soooo… maybe pay attention?
wallagrargh t1_iuh1lo3 wrote
It's also a convenient industry to control when you sometimes need to make evidence or body bags disappear
Sun_Devilish t1_iuhb649 wrote
That's a caricature.
The Grifters On Parade want to maximize their own power and position...just like the Democrats.
To do this, they lie to voters and pretend to share the values and interests of those voters...just like the Democrats.
JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER POLITICAL PARTY AND FACTION.
All of the above employ propagandists whose job it is to persuade voters that their team are the good guys and opposing teams are comprised of fools and demons. All are lying. There are no good guys in politics, just power hungry psychopaths who want to rob the public treasury, seize control over private industry, and tell the rest of us how we must live.
In societies that are not morally and spiritually bankrupt, the ability of these villains to rob and enslave the public are limited. They must maintain a facade of legitimacy in order to maintain the support of their victims, aka voters. They can only go so far. When one political faction or another oversteps its bounds and does things that are clearly immoral or contrary to the public good, their support drops, they lose elections, and another faction increases its power instead. Over and over, round and round, every faction competes for the folly of the electorate, with no side gaining permanent supremacy.
We call this the political process, in which we the people decide which band of criminals we are going to give power to based upon whose lies and empty promises seem most appealing at that moment. Criminal ambitions on all sides are constrained because criminal ambition is set against criminal ambition, and no gang ever wins forever.
But as America proceeds headlong into abject moral and spiritual bankruptcy, this mechanism increasingly fails to function, and the worst of the worst on all sides are emboldened to be overtly criminal in their actions and aims.
Welcome to 2022.
Lone-Sloth t1_iuhc4mt wrote
I'm just trivalizing your issue since you do it so easily to more important ones, obviously there's more to it, but it's still nothing compared to other problems
SquashParticular5381 t1_iui1hj2 wrote
You can say "just like the X" all you want. Fine, there are shared traits. But some politicians ARE worse than others, and the GOP has openly embraced complete manipulation of elections not just through influencing people, but by invalidating actual results. They are actually saying "I will only accept the result of the election if I win. Otherwise I will declare victory anyway and try to stop me - my supporters have more guns". And the platform they push is control of people's personal individual choices with not only an implied threat but explicit threat of physical violence. In America, on a broad scale, this is a low point. Maybe not unique or the lowest, but it's really very low.
Conservatism and authoritarianism go hand in hand. And no, communism is not a counterpoint. Communism is not liberal, nor has it ever been practiced as a form of government. That was fascism pretending to be communism.
And for the record, yes, I believe that could be a real threat too. It's just not currently the imminent threat.
Sun_Devilish t1_iuimxfm wrote
All of the propaganda which portrays the Grifters On Parade as demons and villains can be matched by equally deceptive propaganda designed to portray the Democrats as demons and villains.
Some of this propaganda, put out by both sides, might even be true. Using the truth to tell lies is the hallmark of high grade propaganda.
Do not be fooled into thinking that one or another political party is on your side and fighting the good fight. All political parties are fundamentally corrupt, run by people whose only interest is increasing their own power, wealth, and position.
The most that we as voters can do is play them off against each other and make sure that none ever gain enough power that elections no longer matter, which is something that ALL of them would like to achieve.
SquashParticular5381 t1_iuj6s06 wrote
Truth. I'm pointing out which one I perceive to be (by far) the greatest current threat. I perceive that because their plan could make it impossible to rebalance the system, and remove all possible checks on their power.
We've been lucky, historically, as bad as things have gotten. At least we've had politicians willing to concede defeat and step back to try again. There is honor in honoring that system. Now it's not even that gerrymandering is out of control, but a plan to forcibly ignore results and remove all possibly points of opposition to coup.
AgoraiosBum t1_iuj6ydr wrote
An' it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' anything you please
Sun_Devilish t1_iuje8zt wrote
I've been hearing from the Republicans that the Democrats reject the results of every election that they do not win, and have plans and schemes in place to seize power by force.
I hear the same thing about the Republicans from the Democrats.
These partisan hack accusations have been going on for decades now.
Go spend some time on partisan blogs for both factions and you'll soon discover that they are each making much the same accusations against the other.
The choice between the Republicans and the Democrats is the same as the choice between the Gambinos and the Lucchese.
agreea OP t1_iuagkzq wrote
From the abstract: "We argue that the mafia arose as a response to an exogenous shock in the demand for oranges and lemons, following Lind’s discovery in the late eighteenth century that citrus fruits cured scurvy."
-
When we discovered that citrus cures scurvy, the only place that grew lemons at an industrial scale was Sicily. Sicily didn't have a strong enough state to protect lemon farmers and enforce contracts between them and the rest of the supply chain. So the mafia formed around the opportunity extort / protect farmers and enforce contracts (e.g. futures) between various players in the lemon supply chain.
I've seen this theory elsewhere, including John Dickey's Cosa Nostra: A History of the Sicilian Mafia.
You can probably extrapolate this more generally, that organized criminal groups form around certain industries that the state cannot or will not protect.