Submitted by Several_Cabinet_9725 t3_ytg2z5 in history
gomurifle t1_iw6wpgl wrote
How do you even agedate a footprint to 300k years a go? How do they differentiate the age of the rock itself from the footprint?
[deleted] t1_iw7a1uu wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iw7ieia wrote
[removed]
TheFleebus t1_iw88qn4 wrote
A comment further up said they used Optically Stimulated Luminescence to date the sediment that tuned in to rock. You can read about the dating technique [here](https://www.baylor.edu/geosciences/index.php?id=955929#:~:text=Optically%20stimulated%20luminescence%20(OSL). The rock and the footprint must be the same age as the footprint was made while the sediment was still soft. It was then rapidly covered by more sediment, preserving the impression. Over hundreds of thousands of years, the sediment solidified under the pressure of the overlaying material.
(Edit: fixed link)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments