JamesTheJerk t1_j0t9wln wrote
Reply to comment by PfizerGuyzer in Ancient Grammatical Puzzle That Has Baffled Scientists for 2,500 Years Solved by Cambridge University Student by Superb_Boss289
Sure however the article is vague. If someone reading it sees the word 'machine', what conclusion is most easily drawn? And the entire article is written like that. It's deliberately metaphorical and this naturally confuses unexpecting readers.
PfizerGuyzer t1_j0u3opq wrote
"Pāṇini’s system—4,000 rules detailed in his greatest work, the Aṣṭādhyāyī which is thought to have been written around 500 BC—is meant to work like a machine. Feed in the base and suffix of a word and it should turn them into grammatically correct words and sentences through a step-by-step process."
I don't know. If you guys are having this reaction to the article, then it must in some sense be confusing, but if I were the author I would find this criticism borderline offensive.
JamesTheJerk t1_j0wujgo wrote
Criticism is natural in every aspect of life and if the author is offended, so be it. I don't care and neither should they due to me being a lowly redditor and not a peer to the writer on the subject.
This is my opinion on the article and that's how I feel.
PfizerGuyzer t1_j0wv33p wrote
Your feelings seem motivated by a desire to put others down so you can feel big in comparison.
JamesTheJerk t1_j0wvy7j wrote
Which 'feelings' have I portrayed again? Please disregard my alias as I am not in fact a 'jerk'.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments