unread1701 t1_jacm7k8 wrote
Reply to comment by MTPWAZ in iPhone 15 USB-C Accessories to Have Limited Data and Charging Speeds Without Apple's MFi Certification by ExternalUserError
I might be wrong but I think they mandated the USB-C standard.
-FoxBJK- t1_jacnya7 wrote
> the USB-C standard
See here's the problem with USB right now. This could mean any one of like 5 different USB standards.
broke_fit_dad t1_jaez9mz wrote
USB C wiring isn’t standardized as well as it should be. I have 3 devices on USB C one has a special cable and charger and doesn’t charge or connect on any other set up. The other 2 1 cable works with both chargers for one and one charger works with both cables for the other.
I would wager Apple will use the “ for future expansion” wires in USB C as identifiers
MTPWAZ t1_jad72nv wrote
Nah. Just the port and they it works with existing usb c chargers.
As for the standard that could be any number of things that no one adds to phones. So I doubt they would even try that.
So as long as the new port meets the basic requirements Apple is done. EU would need to update their meaning if they don’t like it.
unread1701 t1_jadf0cg wrote
This is all so weird as Apple is a member of the USB consortium too. I do love their implementation of USB-C on the MacBook Air though. So I hope they do the same for the iPhones.
Super-Perfect-Cell t1_jae6cwp wrote
the USB-C standard is a connector and port shape. absolutely nothing else
Notyourfathersgeek t1_jaefdm5 wrote
USB-C is nothing but a port
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments