Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Consistent-Bird-4121 t1_jeaj8b4 wrote

Something that does not nearly get the attention and praise it deserves. What an outstanding accomplishment šŸ‘

42

DeliPaper t1_jeakqyt wrote

Imagine what could be done if that money was somewhere but Boston...

−28

rolandofgilead41089 t1_jeao2mz wrote

Excuse me, but some idiots online told me that blue states and cities are a mess and don't know how to function, so this must be a lie!

235

DeliPaper t1_jears7h wrote

The economic engine of Norway was mineral wealth. But by investing the money wisely in other sectors, they now have far more sources of income.

If a minute amount of that money went to developing Springfield, Pittsfield, and Worcester as independent cities with their own economic engines instead of payong for ever-scarcer land in Boston, imagine the possibilities.

−11

MissionFreedom7790 t1_jeautc4 wrote

Yeah, we rock. Always knew we were better than the rest. Just a feeling that comes with being a resident of this fine state.

12

Unfair_Isopod534 t1_jeavlk3 wrote

I would love to see the diagrams without including the farm subsidies and/or Medicare.

Overall very generic not much of a substance article.

−9

whoeve t1_jeay92d wrote

This just sounds like trying to make the mess that's in blue states equivalent to the mess that's in red states. I'll take the mess that's in Massachusetts compared to the mess that's in places like Idaho, where they're passing abortion trafficking bills.

32

DeliPaper t1_jeazoph wrote

People can't afford housing in Boston but can afford housing in Worcester. What if you relieve the pressure on Boston by developing Worcester. Perhaps even Springfield.

10

commentsOnPizza t1_jeb09s5 wrote

If we had the housing and transit that people need, we'd be unstoppable

161

DeliPaper t1_jeb2241 wrote

Not quite how the market works. What it actually does is inflate pay, which ripples along the chain and further inflates pay umtil sole services are priced out. And prices go up everywhere else. I know people who commute from Palmer to Boston daily because housing in Boston is too expensive

3

whoeve t1_jeb2btr wrote

I don't know what that has to do with development in Worcester or other cities, however. I also don't know how the state governs development in Boston but not in Worcester.

2

DeliPaper t1_jeb2qyh wrote

>I don't know what that has to do with development in Worcester or other cities, however.

You think they want to commute 2-3 hours each way while paying hefty tolls because I-90 is the only viable road every day? If their need for work could be handled by Worcester or Springfield, it would dramatically improve their lives.

>I also don't know how the state governs development in Boston but not in Worcester.

Whenever any policy is up for discussion, they choose to pursue Boston's wants and desires over everyone else's needs, which is how eleven gotten into this pickle to begin with.

1

ChainmailleAddict t1_jeb3f6c wrote

I really think progressives/socialists would do better around here if they engaged it from the logical "effective spending" side rather than JUST the moral/inequality side. Good spending is something everyone can get behind, and stuff like socialized medicine and tuition-free public colleges are just a good investment that tons of other countries have already figured out.

29

bleep-bl00p-bl0rp t1_jeb4v0f wrote

Try leaving the state. Have you ever been down south, or west of New York? Western Mass could be better, itā€™s certainly got lots of potential, but itā€™s not even close to equivalent to lots of other parts of the country (largely due to state programs).

9

majoroutage t1_jeb5zz0 wrote

This is why a balanced budget is important, no matter your political leanings on what it gets spent on.

9

amos106 t1_jeb6g8u wrote

Did you know that the most popular communist in American history was born in Taunton? William Foster spent his life trying to build organized labor movements across the country. He was especially known for his advocacy towards fighting against racism both within the labor movement and within society at large. His view was that the labor movement wouldn't be able to build class conciousness and solidarity if all of the workers were too busy being racist to one another.

Thankfully our country worked hard to address these issues. Most of the labor organizers were arrested or assassinated. William Foster's works were actually brought before congress during the red scare, it was cited as evidence of how pro-labor anti-racism is "Un-American". Taunton even deindustrialized, you can't organize labor when nobody has jobs! As an added bonus that forced local hospital to cut back on services. Morton doesn't even cover deliveries any more, no more commie babies! šŸ¦…šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø šŸ«”

26

whoeve t1_jeb6r59 wrote

Can you point to some specifics concerning this particular thing? IE, when the state has passed policies that make it so businesses have to develop in Boston instead of those other places?

1

jdp111 t1_jeb71ox wrote

They contribute nothing to the economy? Holy cringe. I for one enjoy having food to eat, among other agricultural products.

I don't like their politics either but this is some next level tribalism.

−16

DeliPaper t1_jeb74x9 wrote

Shutting down S&W because people around Boston hate guns is the most obvious recent one. But truly, it goes all the way back to the time they bought greenbacks for pennies on the dollar from farmers because they knew the feds were about to pay them out.

0

Thiccaca t1_jeb9kx9 wrote

OK, so NOW can we spend some money fixing the damn MBTA? Maybe repave roads too?

241

PLS-Surveyor-US t1_jebdlly wrote

but for some reason has dogshit transportation networks...

19

TheFlabbs t1_jebi12t wrote

I love being able to say Iā€™m from MA. Itā€™s like a golden nugget in this sea of shit we call a country, however itā€™s worth noting that that golden nugget is still submerged in a sea of shit

34

KitchenBreadfruit816 t1_jebj4gx wrote

This is why we should get are SALT back. Itā€™s not fair to be double paying for us and for Tennessee,

7

Marco_Memes t1_jebp3ie wrote

Itā€™s because they donā€™t make enough money to pay for their maintenance, and the repair costs are so high that it gets kicked down the road. So you end up with a bunch of toll free roads slowly falling apart because they canā€™t afford maintenance, because their toll free nature removes any revenue streams. If you want better roads what we need to do is convert highways to toll roads and invest in the T so less people drive on them, which lessens their use, which makes them last longer, which saves money on maintenance.

2

Thiccaca t1_jebpnn2 wrote

MA has the second highest cost per mile for road construction in the US. It is literally twice what it costs to build in Hawaii.

HAWAII....

Where literally everything has to be shipped in.

Wonder who is hoovering up all that cash.

27

jdp111 t1_jebsggl wrote

Not enough to feed the whole country. And it's mainly fruit, vegetables and nuts. If you think we can all just survive off of Californias food you're delusional.

It's also not great for the environment shipping it all the way across the nation.

But yes the red states only produce corn syrup nothing else.

−7

warlocc_ t1_jebsp8j wrote

Insert "taxes are so high, of course we don't need extra from the feds" joke here?

5

TheLyz t1_jebu2zb wrote

Marlborough finally repaved two roads I use pretty often and it feels like a luxury.

But hey if you want to feel better about our roads take a quick trip over the border to RI, you'll feel much better after that.

6

RedditSkippy t1_jebu9d5 wrote

Shocking. Itā€™s like a highly educated bunch of people make money and are highly capable. Go figure.

24

DJScrubatires t1_jebv0b1 wrote

I can point to one area where money can be saved. Most states control traffic with construction laborers doing flagging duty. We open up the OT chest for the Staties to do the same thing essentially.

32

TheTr7nity t1_jebvgzd wrote

This state isnā€™t perfect but itā€™s pretty well run compared to the majority of the other states.

21

Miami_Vice-Grip t1_jebw7ak wrote

I mean we probably could. Survive != over eating like 5k calories a day. The average American diet would have to shrink and CA would have to stop exporting crops but it could hypothetically be done. CA already provides like 45% of fruit and veg, but also exports like 50% of what it produces. So combine all that with the food we import from other countries and I think we'd be ok.

If, of course, we could actually distribute the food equitably. The fact that we haven't beaten food insecurity in this country is absurd and a disgusting failure of governance generally. But that's a problem in all states

5

PLS-Surveyor-US t1_jeby3or wrote

ummm, ok. Blue skies here. Everything fairly normal. Certainly the feds have their impact on the country as a whole but as the post states: Mass has the highest GDP per capita in the country. So one could assume that we can make prudent decisions with those dollars and find ways to make said networks reliable and effective. But no blame the feds or the other 49 states or some other deflection.

We control our destiny. The more people understand this the more things will improve. The great federal rescue from 2008 replaced windows in the next town over from me. They spent hundreds of billions on the program and we got windows. I'm sure a few towns over got a short road repaved and somewhere else replaced a water main. We control our path forward. Time to fix the roads, the rails and the utilities.

0

woohooguy t1_jebyxln wrote

Rich people need poor people to dust their mansions and mind the little shit offspring they canā€™t be bothered to raise themselves, as they are too busy driving the middle class even lower.

17

wgc123 t1_jec6aw5 wrote

Bullshit. Rich people bay want exclusive neighborhoods but they do also want neighboring towns to house their workers. Housing scarcity throughout the region is not something they desire

2

MonkeyFacedPup t1_jec724e wrote

Nah. For one, Mass. is super densely populated already. We can't just build out into open land like they can out west. And when we try to, people get upset about woods being torn down.

Secondly, there's a lot of zoning tyranny. You can only build single family homes in a lot of areas, which provides housing for far fewer people. And a lot of SFH owners wanna keep it that way for "the families" cause they don't want college kids and young professionals making noise in their neighborhoods.

Thirdly, where you can build apartment buildings or triple deckers, they build luxury apartment buildings because apparently there are still enough people to make those profitable.

There's no rich people scheming to keep poor people out of an entire state or city. Stuff like this is almost always caused by bureaucracy or NIMBY shit.

15

saumilj t1_jece5iw wrote

Sync the god damn traffic lights.

1

Marco_Memes t1_jecglge wrote

Probably the idiots in charge? We all know the T is run by incompetent fools, but that doesnā€™t make mass transit a bad thing to invest in bc once you have some mass firings youā€™ve got the problem fixed. Either way their always expensive, thatā€™s why the roads are bad EVERYWHERE. Every state complains about the roads because even where itā€™s cheap itā€™s still to expensive

3

End3rWi99in t1_jecjnin wrote

I think of this when Europeans on Reddit make blanket statements about the US without recognizing places like Massachusetts exist. Heaven forbid any of us live anywhere but Florida and Alabama.

13

kaya-jamtastic t1_jeckcw0 wrote

It can be 10 degrees (F) colder up there, does that not make a difference? Anyway, not trying to defend road construction in MA, I like to joke that the reason the roads are so terrible is because some politicianā€™s brother owns a road construction company

3

ScottyBoy75 t1_jecl1vh wrote

well maybe they should eliminate the tolls on the pike and repair some roads...

1

Elementium t1_jecqm2q wrote

I agree. I'm a weeb for Mass and I was born and raised here.

It is strange though all in all I FEEL like were a B and that makes me terrified for what the rest of the country looks like..

−1

kaya-jamtastic t1_jecu17k wrote

Iā€™m clearly missing something here. Not sure why Iā€™m getting downvoted since Iā€™m not disagreeing with u/Thiccaca, Iā€™m just saying that because we keep getting freezes that then warm up the conditions seem to be getting even worse than they used to be when we had longer periods of deep freeze

I apologize for whatever Iā€™m misinterpreting because Iā€™m apparently clueless

3

blounge87 t1_jed0ij7 wrote

Have you seen the bike lanes in FINLAND, the winter is not the problem at all, itā€™s an excuse to not invest in infrastructure and Americans buy it because most of them never leave their cars anyways and have no idea that they will indeed not freeze to death the vast majority of the time.

9

zephepheoehephe t1_jed2g68 wrote

Two-thirds of Massachusetts lives in the Greater Boston metro. Boston needs a denser and better-connected inner-core to support the sparse and sprawling suburbs... And that's impossible with car infrastructure.

1

oceansofmyancestors t1_jed34py wrote

Thatā€™s great. We have so much money. We should fix our failing bridges.

2

BadDesignMakesMeSad t1_jed8k4i wrote

The secret is that winter weather isnā€™t the main cause of road damage. Itā€™s mostly wear from vehicles, particularly large freight trucks but the big SUVs and oversized pickups that so many people drive are not helping either. A lot of this traffic could be offset if freight railroads werenā€™t shit and if the MBTA was functional but I guess thatā€™s too much to ask

10

dede_smooth t1_jed9d5d wrote

If passenger rail wasnā€™t shit either small cities of students move around the state multiple times throughout the year every year. Putting trains from out west to Boston (preferably near Logan) could relieve tons of student and holiday traffic.

4

GCinMA91 t1_jedfmcl wrote

There are many departments of our state that are incredibly well managed.

And then thereā€™s the Tā€¦

2

Megsmik8 t1_jedjkvx wrote

NY state has a toll system for most of its highways. MA DOES NOT. This is HOW THEY KEEP UP THEIR ROADS and MA does not. It's not rocket science.

Both I-90 and I-87 in NYS are Toll Roads. Except I-87 North of Albany. Tolls in NYS are not cheap, the ONLY Tolls you pay in MA are on I-90 or the Ted Williams, Sumner or Callahan Tunnels.

1

Goldenrule-er t1_jedyetx wrote

Yet we are in desperate need for federal receivership of the MBTA, please!

It's killing people and causing literally all of our traffic problems.

No one can rely on it to get to work on time so everyone drives.

1

abat6294 t1_jee21j8 wrote

You're saying the bluest state has the least dependence on government dollars?

Huh, isn't that neat.

8

IH8Pickulz t1_jee3nkh wrote

I feel like this just means we are getting more fucked on taxes than most other states...

1

MammothCat1 t1_jee6er8 wrote

It's gotten worse since COVID. I've watched all manner of life just toss everything from the average McDonald's to vape charges and even a phone once (could've been for other reasons but still thrown).

Came to the conclusion that people just dont give a damn about their cities anymore. Or your city if they are visiting. Look at Walmart parking lots in general, cesspools.

But what are you going to do? Yell at them? No enforcement causes this, no repercussion means it's no crime right?

2

charons-voyage t1_jeexdtm wrote

You clearly donā€™t have kids if you think people sending their kids to daycare ā€œcanā€™t be bothered to raiseā€ them themselves lol. Both parents NEED to work in MA since everything is so fucking expensive. I wish we didnā€™t need daycare, but we do.

1

charons-voyage t1_jeeybbk wrote

Europe isnā€™t some magical utopia either lol. Lots of places have shit infrastructure and shit politicians and huge income inequality too but for some reason American redditors see one picture of a bike lane in Amsterdam and a train in Germany and think thatā€™s how all of Europe is šŸ˜‚

1

medforddad t1_jeeywsg wrote

I thought we were just talking outside cities. If you want to talk about cities, it's not like buffalo is known for their pothole-free streets: /r/Buffalo/comments/sxy10m/allen_street_potholes_this_is_getting_ridiculous

1

RandyCheeseburgers01 t1_jeeze9p wrote

To be fair, (Greater) Boston, with its huge student population, is part of the Northeast Corridor, which connects cities from Boston to DC and has the best intra- and intercity passenger rail in the US-- not that that's a very high bar, but still.

2

Megsmik8 t1_jefgrlg wrote

Because no one actually thinks it through. They donā€™t know NYS. Most people east of 495 know east of 495 and thatā€™s it. They travel North to NH, ME for both summer and skiing. Maybe also VT for skiing. Then thereā€™s also the Cape in the summer. If they do go to NYS itā€™s typically not often and itā€™s downstate. You donā€™t hit Tolls on I-95 until you hit the Bridges. If you take I-84 itā€™s the same, you hit a toll at the Newburgh-Beacon Bridge. If you drive on the parkways in NYS, which arenā€™t toll roads, they arenā€™t nearly as good.

3

Initial_Scarcity_609 t1_jegbol5 wrote

I follow this subreddit and also /r/Florida that stark contrast and positive news I see on here compared to there makes me sad

1