-Horatio_Alger_Jr- t1_itrkt4d wrote on October 25, 2022 at 7:57 PM

I love how for 2 years leading up to the 2020 election, the media was saying how easy it was to hack voting machines and steal elections. As soon as the Democrats won, we are no longer able to talk about that stuff anymore. Seems strange to me.

DumbshitOnTheRight t1_itrs72h wrote on October 25, 2022 at 8:43 PM

If you have physical access to those machines, they're hackable. That's true of damned near every computing device.

There is no evidence that occurred, in either the 2016 or 2020 elections.

-Horatio_Alger_Jr- t1_itrw85y wrote on October 25, 2022 at 9:09 PM

Again, It is funny how the media, for 2+ years, before the 2020 election kept talking about vulnerability in our voting system. If you even speak about the subject after 2020, you are an "election denier".

Just strange to me, that is all.

DumbshitOnTheRight t1_itryp2f wrote on October 25, 2022 at 9:26 PM

Not it's not, because you're deliberately and dishonestly conflating "Voting machine security if you can get your hands on the innards are hackable" and "the election was compromised by hacked voting machines."

I've also noticed the "election deniers" (read: The people who thin without a shred of evidence that the votes tallied were compromised) also think those elected from the GOP should be unseated as well.

-Horatio_Alger_Jr- t1_its7i4q wrote on October 25, 2022 at 10:28 PM

We had people calling Trump an illegitimate president without any proof of Russia interference for years before the investigation was complete. Are they "election deniers"? They had no evidence?

How about in 2001 when Rep. Waters objected and attempted to challenge the certification?

How about in 2005 when Rep. Jones and Sen. Boxer challenged and objected the certification for Bush due to "voter irregularities"?

How about in 2017 when House Demograts challenged the electoral vote?

Were they all election deniers also?