> Percentages are not a good way of measuring a lot of things.

True.

>This is one of them.

Not true, and you've failed to show that.

You could've made this argument on a quality front, like maybe the 2.66% that's missing on Netflix Canada but is available on Netflix US is the content that everyone watches, but you failed to do so (likely because I suspect that you'd be wrong to make this argument).

Just going "Total too big so no percentage please" means nothing.

>What determines significant in this context is how much less stuff you've got to watch. I think having 200 fewer shows and movies is a significant difference.

Why 200? Why not 250? Why not 5000? Why not 10? I want my 10 movies. If I don't have those 10 movies Americans have I'll scream. Give them to me.