Submitted by Sisiwakanamaru t3_10oxrvx in movies
Mirororim t1_j6oaab9 wrote
Reply to comment by TheWaterBound in Australia to Impose Local Content Quotas on Streaming Platforms by Sisiwakanamaru
> Percentages are not a good way of measuring a lot of things.
True.
>This is one of them.
Not true, and you've failed to show that.
You could've made this argument on a quality front, like maybe the 2.66% that's missing on Netflix Canada but is available on Netflix US is the content that everyone watches, but you failed to do so (likely because I suspect that you'd be wrong to make this argument).
Just going "Total too big so no percentage please" means nothing.
>What determines significant in this context is how much less stuff you've got to watch. I think having 200 fewer shows and movies is a significant difference.
Why 200? Why not 250? Why not 5000? Why not 10? I want my 10 movies. If I don't have those 10 movies Americans have I'll scream. Give them to me.
TheWaterBound t1_j6oaohn wrote
>Why 200? Why not 250? Why not 5000? Why not 10? I want my 10 movies. If I don't have those 10 movies Americans have I'll scream. Give them to me.
Congratulations, you have made the argument for me.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments